Forum Discussion

Nimbostratus

Jan 21, 2020

Solved

SRV record response to contain different priority response everytime

Hello Experts, I have following setup for SRV record This is hosted as WideIP: _collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com Based on topology records this is taking me to a nearest possible region. I...

cjunior
Jan 22, 2020
Hi,
I think you can work with weight values in topology records to achieve your expectations.
Is it possible to summarize the records for each data center and balance the load? Otherwise, it may be necessary to create an SRV pool to assign a high priority member to each member in the datacenter.

In a given scenario:

DC/Server:
  DC_AMS
    vs_srv_ams1 10.10.0.1
    vs_srv_ams2 10.10.0.2
    vs_srv_ams3 10.10.0.3

  DC_FRA
    vs_srv_fra1 10.20.0.1
    vs_srv_fra2 10.20.0.2
    vs_srv_fra3 10.20.0.3

  DC_USA
    vs_srv_usa1 10.30.0.1
    vs_srv_usa2 10.30.0.2
    vs_srv_usa3 10.30.0.3

Pool:
  A pool_abcamsterdam.xyz.com
    vs_srv_ams1
    vs_srv_ams2
    vs_srv_ams3

  A pool_abcfrance.xyz.com
    vs_srv_fra1
    vs_srv_fra2
    vs_srv_fra3

  A pool_abcusa.xyz.com
    vs_srv_usa1
    vs_srv_usa2
    vs_srv_usa3

  SRV pool_AMS_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    (LB: Topology | Maximum Answers Returned: 2)
    abcamsterdam.xyz.com  Priority 10
    abcfrance.xyz.com    Priority 20
    abcusa.xyz.com     Priority 20

  SRV pool_FRA_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    (LB: Topology | Maximum Answers Returned: 2)
    abcfrance.xyz.com    Priority 10
    abcamsterdam.xyz.com  Priority 20
    abcusa.xyz.com     Priority 20

  SRV pool_USA_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    (LB: Topology | Maximum Answers Returned: 2)
    abcusa.xyz.com     Priority 10
    abcamsterdam.xyz.com  Priority 20
    abcfrance.xyz.com    Priority 20

WideIP:
  A abcamsterdam.xyz.com
    pool_abcamsterdam.xyz.com

  A abcfrance.xyz.com
    pool_abcfrance.xyz.com

  A abcusa.xyz.com
    pool_abcusa.xyz.com

  SRV _collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    (LB: Topology)
    pool_AMS_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    pool_FRA_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    pool_USA_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com

Topology record:
  Region is AMS: pool pool_AMS_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
  Region is AMS: subnet 10.10.0/24 - Weight 10
  Region is AMS: subnet 10.20.0/24 - Weight 5
  Region is AMS: subnet 10.30.0/24 - Weight 5

  Region is FRA: pool pool_FRA_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
  Region is FRA: subnet 10.20.0/24 - Weight 10
  Region is FRA: subnet 10.10.0/24 - Weight 5
  Region is FRA: subnet 10.30.0/24 - Weight 5

  Region is USA: pool pool_USA_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
  Region is USA: subnet 10.30.0/24 - Weight 10
  Region is USA: subnet 10.10.0/24 - Weight 5
  Region is USA: subnet 10.20.0/24 - Weight 5

It's just a possibility to deploy.
You can play with weight and maximum answers to reach other as well.

Let me know if it solves to you.
Regards.

Anuj

Nimbostratus

Jan 22, 2020

Thank you sharing the suggestion.

All Data centers are remote and for them I just have respective FQDN and IP for which we are authoritative in GTM. Apart from that, there is no more visibility. Record summarization is a little challenging but I will explore this.

My concern is that I have at-least 3-4 IPs/clusters in every region. In every region when queried there should be only entry from that region in response and in every subsequent DNS SRV responses they should also change like if I go via this logic that you have mentioned

SRV pool_AMS_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com

(LB: Topology | Maximum Answers Returned: 2)

abcamsterdam.xyz.com Priority 10

abcfrance.xyz.com Priority 20

abcusa.xyz.com Priority 20

SRV pool_FRA_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com

(LB: Topology | Maximum Answers Returned: 2)

abcfrance.xyz.com Priority 10

abcamsterdam.xyz.com Priority 20

abcusa.xyz.com Priority 20

SRV pool_USA_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com

(LB: Topology | Maximum Answers Returned: 2)

abcusa.xyz.com Priority 10

abcamsterdam.xyz.com Priority 20

abcfrance.xyz.com Priority 20

In every pool I need to provide at-least one more entry from each region like:

SRV pool_AMS_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com

(LB: Topology | Maximum Answers Returned: 2)

abcamsterdam.xyz.com Priority 10

abcfrance.xyz.com Priority 20

abcusa.xyz.com Priority 20

abcamsterdam1.xyz.com Priority 10

abcfrance1.xyz.com Priority 20

abcusa1.xyz.com Priority 20

SRV pool_FRA_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com

(LB: Topology | Maximum Answers Returned: 2)

abcfrance.xyz.com Priority 10

abcamsterdam.xyz.com Priority 20

abcusa.xyz.com Priority 20

abcfrance1.xyz.com Priority 10

abcamsterdam1.xyz.com Priority 20

abcusa1.xyz.com Priority 20

SRV pool_USA_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com

(LB: Topology | Maximum Answers Returned: 2)

abcusa.xyz.com Priority 10

abcamsterdam.xyz.com Priority 20

abcfrance.xyz.com Priority 20

abcusa1.xyz.com Priority 10

abcamsterdam1.xyz.com Priority 20

abcfrance1.xyz.com Priority 20

Now, when any user queries for Amsterdam then logic will take it to Amsterdam pool. Now from that pool I need only ONE amsterdam FQDN response in the SRV response out of 2 responses. Plus, in next query it should also utilize the other amsterdam FQDN in response.

Let me know if this clarifies my request a little more OR feel free to revert if I haven't understood your solution properly.

Thanks again for all the help.

Regards

cjunior
Nacreous
Jan 22, 2020
Yep, think I got it before.
The cost is to replicate objects. For each number, one pool member as high priority.

Like this:

Pool:
  SRV pool_AMS1_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    (LB: Topology | Maximum Answers Returned: 2)
    abcamsterdam1.xyz.com  Priority 10
    abcfrance1.xyz.com   Priority 20
    abcusa1.xyz.com     Priority 20
    abcfrance2.xyz.com   Priority 20
    abcusa2.xyz.com     Priority 20

  SRV pool_AMS2_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    (LB: Topology | Maximum Answers Returned: 2)
    abcamsterdam2.xyz.com  Priority 10
    abcfrance1.xyz.com   Priority 20
    abcusa1.xyz.com     Priority 20
    abcfrance2.xyz.com   Priority 20
    abcusa2.xyz.com     Priority 20

  SRV pool_FRA1_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    (LB: Topology | Maximum Answers Returned: 2)
    abcfrance1.xyz.com   Priority 10
    abcamsterdam1.xyz.com  Priority 20
    abcusa1.xyz.com     Priority 20
    abcamsterdam2.xyz.com  Priority 20
    abcusa2.xyz.com     Priority 20

  SRV pool_FRA2_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    (LB: Topology | Maximum Answers Returned: 2)
    abcfrance2.xyz.com   Priority 10
    abcamsterdam1.xyz.com  Priority 20
    abcusa1.xyz.com     Priority 20
    abcamsterdam2.xyz.com  Priority 20
    abcusa2.xyz.com     Priority 20

  SRV pool_USA1_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    (LB: Topology | Maximum Answers Returned: 2)
    abcusa1.xyz.com     Priority 10
    abcamsterdam1.xyz.com  Priority 20
    abcfrance1.xyz.com   Priority 20
    abcamsterdam2.xyz.com  Priority 20
    abcfrance2.xyz.com   Priority 20

  SRV pool_USA2_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    (LB: Topology | Maximum Answers Returned: 2)
    abcusa2.xyz.com     Priority 10
    abcamsterdam1.xyz.com  Priority 20
    abcfrance1.xyz.com   Priority 20
    abcamsterdam2.xyz.com  Priority 20
    abcfrance2.xyz.com   Priority 20


Topology record:
Region is AMS: pool pool_AMS1_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com - Weight 1
Region is AMS: pool pool_AMS2_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com - Weight 1
Region is AMS: subnet 10.10.0/24 - Weight 10
Region is AMS: subnet 10.20.0/24 - Weight 5
Region is AMS: subnet 10.30.0/24 - Weight 5

Region is FRA: pool pool_FRA1_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com - Weight 1
Region is FRA: pool pool_FRA2_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com - Weight 1
Region is FRA: subnet 10.20.0/24 - Weight 10
Region is FRA: subnet 10.10.0/24 - Weight 5
Region is FRA: subnet 10.30.0/24 - Weight 5

Region is USA: pool pool_USA1_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com - Weight 1
Region is USA: pool pool_USA2_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com - Weight 1
Region is USA: subnet 10.30.0/24 - Weight 10
Region is USA: subnet 10.10.0/24 - Weight 5
Region is USA: subnet 10.20.0/24 - Weight 5

WideIP:
  SRV _collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    (LB: Topology)
    pool_AMS1_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    pool_AMS2_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    pool_FRA1_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    pool_FRA2_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    pool_USA1_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com
    pool_USA2_collab-edge.tls_.xyz.com

I particularly don't like this approach :/
I can't see other best option then my first post.

Do It works for you?
Best regards.

Forum Discussion

SRV record response to contain different priority response everytime

Recent Discussions

import live updates from version x to version y

Tenant image upgrade

iRule editor partition button does not work

F5Access | MacOS Sonoma

Overwriting or adding LTM SSL Traffic cert and key using iControlREST

Related Content

Introduction of Incident Response

custom response page for api

Copper SFP Differences

FIX Message Response

Logging of DNS Requests and Responses without a DNS license