08-Mar-2009 10:31
I am trying to find out if F5 can be used in place of Microsoft Load Balancing.
What they (work) are looking to do is this...
They want to be able to use the F5 for drive mapping.
they want the vs ip address to map to a folder that will be set up across multiple servers.
example: run
\\servername\Testfolder$
will map to a the Testfolder on specified server
Can I set up a vs with say four servers in the pool so the users can map
\\vs\Testfolder$
Thanks
09-Mar-2009
06:28
- last edited on
01-Jun-2023
08:30
by
JimmyPackets
You can configure a Performance L4 virtual server on port 445 pointing to a pool of windows servers to load balance the SMB traffic. Here are two posts you can reference for setting this up:
File share high availability
http://devcentral.f5.com/Default.aspx?tabid=53&forumid=25&tpage=1&view=topic&postid=22206
External Monitor for Shared Folders
http://devcentral.f5.com/Default.aspx?tabid=53&forumid=32&tpage=1&view=topic&postid=2292025084
And a sample configuration:
virtual test_fastl4_port445_vs {
snat automap
pool test_port445_pool
destination 10.1.1.1:445
ip protocol 6
profiles fastL4
persist source_addr
}
pool test_port445_pool {
members 10.2.2.2:445
members 10.2.2.3:445
}
Aaron
01-Dec-2020 17:54 - edited 21-Mar-2022 01:53
- a community member contacted us looking for "information on using multiple SMB shares across a single F5 VS". The question is 404'ng but this answer you mention about File Share HA (also badly formatted from a previous ETL exercise) might have the answer?
I need to go into the wayback machine to see if I can figure out what that link WAS supposed to point to but figured I'd ask if you know of some more current info to help out?
09-Mar-2009 06:38
07-Apr-2014 08:22
Such an excellent article - could we not create an iApp rule for this as it's a great feature that I've been searching absolutely everywhere for! Thanks again.