F5 Sites
  • F5.com
  • F5 Labs
  • MyF5
  • NGINX
  • Partner Central
  • Education Services Portal (ESP)
Contact
  • Under Attack?
  • F5 Support
  • DevCentral Support
  • F5 Sales
  • NGINX Sales
  • F5 Professional Services
Skip to contentBrand Logo
Forums
CrowdSRC
Articles
GroupsEventsSuggestionsHow Do I...?
RegisterSign In
  1. DevCentral
  2. CrowdSRC
  3. CodeShare

Microsoft Skype for Business Server 2015

Problem this snippet solves: New release candidate iApp template and deployment guide for Microsoft Skype for Business Server 2015 (formerly Lync Server 2010/2013). For more information and complet...
Published Jul 06, 2015
Version 1.0
f5.microsoft_skype_server_2015.v1.0.0rc131 KB
application delivery
devops
iApps
LTM
lync
Joe_Jordan's avatar
Joe_Jordan
Ret. Employee
Joined November 15, 2004
View Profile
JamesSevedge_23's avatar
JamesSevedge_23
Historic F5 Account
Sep 27, 2016

Hello LH, As far as the reverse proxy deployment goes, those objects are still tied together. The reason being is it is presenting the reverse proxy section as a whole. The objects created for reverse proxy are the same whether director role is enabled or not, the only difference is if director role is enabled then a pool is created based on the director pool member IP field in the iApp and the iRule attached to the 80/443(on external) VIP passes the majority of the traffic through to the director pool/big ip instead of the front end. Now the exception is when using split LTM's(as you are) where different sets of objects are created in different places. But in either case the only "dummy" fields would be including a front end fake pool member ip potentially, and depending on single/split some unnecessary LTM objects. But for reverse proxy this is not on our roadmap to break out.

 

In the case of the reverse proxy the best practice is to terminate SSL, this is for various reasons. So the iApp does require a valid cert and for ssl ports will use that cert selected.

 

For the 4443 objects not getting created, please download a slightly newer version of the rc posted here and retry, thanks! I was not able to reproduce the error you got about illegal sharing so if it still occurs with the new template then could you provide more details on the errors received?

 

Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!

What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)

ABOUT DEVCENTRAL

DevCentral NewsTechnical ForumTechnical ArticlesTechnical CrowdSRCCommunity GuidelinesDevCentral EULAGet a Developer Lab LicenseBecome a DevCentral MVP

RESOURCES

Product DocumentationWhite PapersGlossaryCustomer StoriesWebinarsFree Online CoursesTraining & Certification

SUPPORT

Manage SubscriptionsProfessional ServicesCreate a Service RequestSoftware DownloadsSupport Portal

PARTNERS

Find a Reseller PartnerTechnology AlliancesBecome an F5 PartnerLogin to Partner Central

©2026 F5, Inc. All rights reserved.
TrademarksPoliciesPrivacyCalifornia PrivacyDo Not Sell My Personal Information