Increased Security With First Party Cookies

HTTP cookies are an essential part of many web based applications, useful for tracking session and state information.  But they can also be exploited to leak information to third party sites using a method known as Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF).  A CSRF attack takes advantage of the web browser behavior which results in cookies being sent to third party sites when a page contains mixed content.  This results in cross-site information leakage, and depending on the content of the cookies, could provide an attacker with information to hijack a user session.

SameSite Attribute

As of this writing, there is a Internet draft standard for directing clients to only send ‘first party’ cookies. In a nutshell, the standard defines a new, backwards-compatible attribute for the Set-Cookie header named SameSite.  When the SameSite attribute is present, compliant browsers will only send that cookie with requests where the requested resource and the top-level browsing context match the cookie.  This becomes another layer of a “defense in depth” strategy, mitigating CSRF and cross-site script including (XSSI) attacks.  SameSite is supported in recent Chrome and Firefox browsers.

SameSite can be specified alone, or with explicit values “Strict” or “Lax”, corresponding to differing levels of lock-down.  

Specifying SameSite can increase security, but it is not appropriate for all applications.  One example would be “mash-up” applications, those which intentionally pull and embed content from different sites, may require cross-site cookies to function correctly.  Also, some single sign-on features may require cross-context authentication that involves cookies.

So how can you secure your apps?  Big IP provides 3 ways to add SameSite attribute to Set-Cookie headers, two of which are described below: iRules and LTM Policy.  Mentioned in another article, the Application Security module also provides a setting to enable SameSite.

iRule to add SameSite attribute

Here is iRule which can handle multiple Set-Cookie headers in a response.  If a Set-Cookie header already has SameSite attribute present, it is passed through unmodified.  This allows an administrator to set a baseline security level, say by specifying “SameSite=Lax” in an iRule, but allows for individual apps to control their security level by generating headers with their own Set-Cookie header, with say “SameSite=Strict”.

when HTTP_RESPONSE {
    # Set-Cookie header can occur multiple times, treat as list
    set num [HTTP::header count Set-Cookie]
    if {$num > 0} {
        foreach set_cookie [HTTP::header values Set-Cookie] {
            # only modify if header does not have SameSite attribute
            set foundSameSite [string match -nocase "*SameSite*" $set_cookie ]
            if {[expr {!$foundSameSite} ]} {
                set set_cookie [concat $set_cookie "; SameSite"]
            }
            # collect modified and unmodified values in list newcookies
            lappend newcookies $set_cookie
        }

        if {$num == 1} {
            # overwrite existing
            HTTP::header Set-Cookie [lindex $newcookies 0]
        } else {
            # remove and replace
            HTTP::header remove Set-Cookie
            foreach set_cookie $newcookies {
                HTTP::header insert Set-Cookie $set_cookie
            }
        }
        
    }
}

 

LTM Policy

Below is a sample LTM Policy which will tag “; SameSite” to the end of a Set-Cookie header that doesn’t have one already.  One limitation to be aware of is that there can be multiple Set-Cookie headers in an HTTP response, and LTM policy can only replace the last one. 

Here is a screenshot from the GUI showing an LTM Policy rule which 

Here is the resulting policy as it would appear in the /config/bigip.conf configuration file:

ltm policy first-party-cookies {
    requires { http }
    rules {
        r1 {
            actions {
                0 {
                    http-header
                    response
                    replace
                    name Set-Cookie
                    value "tcl:[HTTP::header Set-Cookie]; SameSite"
                }
            }
            conditions {
                0 {
                    http-header
                    response
                    name Set-Cookie
                    not
                    contains
                    values { SameSite }
                }
            }
        }
    }
    status published
    strategy first-match
}

 

 

Published Mar 30, 2018
Version 1.0

Was this article helpful?

16 Comments

  • The above worked initially for us too but then caused errors with different parts of the application. We just went through about 7 different iterations before we finally got one to work. Below is the one that was successful. To be clear, this is to ALLOW third-party-cookies and changes the same site attribute to None.

     

    ltm rule generic_samesite_none {

      when HTTP_RESPONSE {

    set cookie_headers [HTTP::header values "Set-Cookie"]

    HTTP::header remove "Set-Cookie"

     

    foreach set_cookie_header $cookie_headers {

      HTTP::header insert "Set-Cookie" "${set_cookie_header}; SameSite=None"

    }

    }

    }

     

     

     

     

     

  • ​Hi All,

     

    I'm hoping to solve an upcoming change in Chrome where SameSite cookie processing is undergoing a change in a Chrome release in Feb 2020.  As I understand it, I must address this or some of my sites will fail if the user is using the Feb release of Chrome 80.

     

    I tried the above iRule but it seems to fail immediately.

    Does anyone have any other iRule type suggestions here? 

     

    Thanks all!!

    Dan

     

  • Hi Danny, just a note to THANK YOU for your suggestion. So far, this looks like it is working in all our environments and it's saved us countless hours working on a server side solution. I owe you a beer (or ten)!

    Thanks again!

    Chris

  • DannyG's avatar
    DannyG
    Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus

    Hi Chris, I did get it working on 11.6 at least. Our use case was to set samesite=none as well. The issue was on this line "  HTTP::header Set-Cookie [lindex $newcookies 0]" . Its started working when I added replace between HTTP:header and Set-Cookie like so "  HTTP::header replace Set-Cookie [lindex $newcookies 0]". Not sure if this is a syntax thing with my version but it cleared out the errors I was seeing. Below is what I am using including the the samesite=none.

     

    when HTTP_RESPONSE {

      # Set-Cookie header can occur multiple times, treat as list

      set num [HTTP::header count Set-Cookie]

     

      if {$num > 0} {

        foreach set_cookie [HTTP::header values Set-Cookie] {

          # only modify if header does not have SameSite attribute

          set foundSameSite [string match -nocase "*SameSite*" $set_cookie ]

          if {[expr {!$foundSameSite} ]} {

            set set_cookie [concat $set_cookie "; SameSite=None"]

          }

          # collect modified and unmodified values in list newcookies

          lappend newcookies $set_cookie

        }

        if {$num == 1} {

          # overwrite existing

          HTTP::header replace Set-Cookie [lindex $newcookies 0]

        } else {

          # remove and replace

          HTTP::header remove Set-Cookie

          foreach set_cookie $newcookies {

            HTTP::header insert Set-Cookie $set_cookie

     

          }

        }

      }

    }

  • This is failing for me too. However, in my case, we have a collaboration portal and must ALLOW third party cookies. This is tied to Googles browser change. I've tried modifying the above irule and changed the set cookie line to:

    set set_cookie [concat $set_cookie "; SameSite=None"]

    However, this resulted in duplicate cookies and the collaboration portal connection failed. Changing the policy rule to:

    value "tcl:[HTTP::header Set-Cookie]; SameSite=None"

    also failed to work.

    There has to be an easy way to modify the cookie value to Samesite=None to allow our Chrome users to continue to use the portal. I am a network admin and not a developer so any assistance is appreciated.

  • DannyG's avatar
    DannyG
    Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus

    Having problems getting the above iRule to work on 11.6. is there something special that requires a newer release? thanks