F5 Sites
  • F5.com
  • LearnF5
  • NGINX
  • MyF5
  • Partner Central
Contact
  • Under Attack?
  • F5 Support
  • DevCentral Support
  • F5 Sales
  • NGINX Sales
  • F5 Professional Services
Skip to contentBrand Logo
Forums
CrowdSRC
Articles
Groups
EventsSuggestionsHow Do I...?
RegisterSign In
  1. DevCentral
  2. Articles
  3. Technical Articles

F5 Certified Practice Exams

Thinking of taking the F5 Certified 101 or 201 exams but not sure if you are ready? Ease the anxiety by taking a F5 Practice Exam! That’s what I did, and it sure helped. If you remember, ba...
Published Dec 12, 2017
Version 1.0
application delivery
BIG-IP
certification
education
practice
PSilva's avatar
PSilva
Ret. Employee
Joined May 16, 2019
View Profile
PSilva's avatar
PSilva
Ret. Employee
Joined May 16, 2019
View Profile
Ken_Salchow's avatar
Ken_Salchow
Icon for Employee rankEmployee
Dec 13, 2017

Thomas - the short answer is that while we fully intend to deliver practice versions of our exams, we cannot tell you if, or even when, any will be released.

 

The longer answer: The value of our practice exams is that they are real, valid exams; i.e. we could have used them for production, but designated them as practice exams. This gives candidates a true assessment of their preparedness and expected performance on the production exam.

 

In order to do this, we need enough validated questions to build both a production exam as well as an independent practice version (no shared questions). In the case of 301b, we did not have sufficient beta participation to validate enough items to do this. We released the production version and are reviewing the performance of the pilot items on that exam to see if we can build a practice exam using these items (this happened this week). Although the psychometricians are still reviewing the data, the preliminary review suggested that we still do not have sufficient items to field a practice exam.

 

Frankly, we could put a practice exam out just for the sake of offering one; however, without being truly equivalent to the production version, it would make us look good, but be dishonest and not beneficial to candidates. I won't do that. Unless what we have has true value and is empirically capable of assessing production performance and producing valid guidance, I can't in good-conscious put it out there. That is not how we work.

 

BTW This is a good example of why candidate participation in exam development is so important. In addition to small-group participation in exam development, we also do a large-scale Job-Task Analysis Survey and Beta Exam for every exam version. Despite the fact the JTA survey allows candidates to provide real-world evaluations to determine what topics are included in the exam, we generally get very limited participation. The same goes for beta. We sent out over 4,000 invitations to the currently running 304Beta and as of today have less than 200 candidates who have taken or scheduled the exam. Based on this, I don't know if we will be able to field a practice exam for this upcoming exam either. I just don't know until all the data comes in.

 

Cheers,

 

ABOUT DEVCENTRAL

DevCentral NewsTechnical ForumTechnical ArticlesTechnical CrowdSRCCommunity GuidelinesDevCentral EULAGet a Developer Lab LicenseBecome a DevCentral MVP

RESOURCES

Product DocumentationWhite PapersGlossaryCustomer StoriesWebinarsFree Online CoursesF5 CertificationLearnF5 Training

SUPPORT

Manage SubscriptionsProfessional ServicesProfessional ServicesCreate a Service RequestSoftware DownloadsSupport Portal

PARTNERS

Find a Reseller PartnerTechnology AlliancesBecome an F5 PartnerLogin to Partner Central

F5 logo©2024 F5, Inc. All rights reserved.
TrademarksPoliciesPrivacyCalifornia PrivacyDo Not Sell My Personal Information