May 02, 2018
Agreed, a back-tracking function would be really useful. Good idea!
Regarding the data structure:
The end goal here should be to grab all the pools that is directly, or indirectly (via iRules, or data-group lists) associated with a virtual server right? Then, perhaps part of the iRule processing could be to:
- Scan the iRule for data group lists.
- For each data group list found, add any pools associated with it to the irules.pools list.
- Then the old VIP logic can be maintained.
Then technically the pools associated with an iRule is still "correct". What do you think?
Agree about the iRule processing being done server side.
/Patrik
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)