Forum Discussion
Nick_T_68319
Nimbostratus
Mar 06, 2012vCMP on Viprion 2400
I am retiring some of our 6900's and 3600's to migrate to a Viprion 2400. Does anyone use vCMP yet? If you virtualize the instances, is the performance less than not virtualizing the instances? Has...
pete_71470
Cirrostratus
Mar 19, 2013We're running single-blade 2400's but without vCMP and don't see what you're seeing. During peak production traffic for a busy VIP (ssl offload client and server, X-Forwarded-For, several simple iRules) we see 1.3gbps client and 1.3gbps server traffic without any performance problems on the 2400 cpu/memory. The 1.3gbps peak is probably due to SNAT providing insufficient variation in trunk member assignment with upstream cisco equipment. In our experience, the 2400 is quite a beast. For us, the 'hey, why is it slow when going through the F5 but not when going to the node directly' complaints are nearly always related to frame buffer saturation (drops) on cisco equipment leading to devices spinning their wheels waiting for retransmissions, reassembly, etc.
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects