Forum Discussion
felix001_29321
Nimbostratus
Dec 14, 2012UIE Persistance Records
Im using a universial persistance profile with an irule attached.
However when I look at the persistance records I see that the client addr is not populated.
Any ideas
root@f5ltm(Active)(tmos) show ltm persistence persist-records all-properties
Sys::Persistent Connections
universal - 172.16.100.10:80 - 192.168.1.31:80
------------------------------------------------
TMM 0
Mode universal
Key e2b454e150fb4d600244180790d86eb8
Age (sec.) 9
Virtual Name VS-172.16.100.10-80
Virtual Addr 172.16.100.10:80
Node Addr 192.168.1.31:80
Pool Name POOL-172.16.100.254
Client Addr ::
4 Replies
- Chris_Phillips
Nimbostratus
well as you're not persisting on the client address, it's just not applicable here. - felix001_29321
Nimbostratus
True but I have another F5 with this same setup showing this value. Even though cookie persist is being used within UIE. Any ideas ?? I thought it may be down to SNAT but on testing this doesnt appear to be the case.
Thanks, - felix001_29321
Nimbostratus
Does anyone have any idea about this ? - nitass
Employee
is client ip changed after persistence record is created? i suggest you open a support case if you want to know whether it is bug or expected behavior.
anyway, you know since persistence is not based on client ip, this won't cause an issue.
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects