Forum Discussion
U_franco_117956
Nimbostratus
NimbostratusTCL error logged when two irules are applied to HTTP and/or HTTPS vservers
Hi.
We have applied two irules to HTTP and HTTPS vservers with the same virtual IP. Both irules works fine individually. However sometimes or sporadically we are obtaining this kind of errors on /v...
Philippe_CLOUP
Employee
EmployeeHi Franco, i did some tests in my lab, and as mentioned by Thomas, as far as you have a default pool position on your VS, the [LB::server pool] is fine. If it is positioned by an iRule (and there is no default in your Pool, Resources), then the result can be "" (empty). And in that case, here is the log i have when doing the "active_members -list [LB::server_pool]"
no such pool: (line 1) invoked from within "active_members [LB::server pool]"
So can you confirm that you are not setting the pool from an iRule ?
U_franco_117956Nimbostratus
NimbostratusThanks Philou for your tests.
However one pool is configured for each vserver in GUI, and then both irules have been added in Resource section. So I assume default pool for each vserver has been configured.
Shall I configure default pool on the top of persistence iRule?? Bear in mind in this momment We are using the same persistence irule for HTTP and HTTPS services with the same virtual IP (both services have the same members too, but with different port ;-)). If you are suggesting me to configure default pool at the top of the irule, I had to configure a different irule for HTTP and HTTPS services. Am I wrong??
