Forum Discussion
LeeG_118759
Nimbostratus
May 21, 2013Take Pool Member offline for service upgrade
Disclaimer: I may not be using correct terminology. ( Pool member environment: Windows Server 2008 R2)
We have a pool named LF_Pool, with two members: 10.16.20.83:9080 and 10.16.20.84:9080 ...
LeeG_118759
Nimbostratus
May 22, 2013Well, we had mostly success, but with a two points of wonder. First, I tested my web service using Fiddler (a simple HTTP GET query) without altering the "Action On Service Down" setting (e.g. left it as "None"). When we set one of the nodes in the pool Offline, Fiddler still continued to communicate with that offline node. I don't believe Fiddler is sending any "Keep-Alive" header or any other header to keep persistence... so I'm ignorant as to what is keeping the connection alive.
Then... when we changed the "Action On Service Down" in the BIG-IP settings window to "Reject"... my tests started working as expected. Steve, do you feel this is the recommended way to achieve taking a pool member down for maintenance? Do you recommend an alternative way? I'm not the Admin of the BIG-IP... just a developer, so I need a little hand-holding. Thanks.
-Lee
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects
