Take Pool Member offline for service upgrade

Thanks Steve, I think those two ideas are tremendously helpful. I'm not explicitly using persistence in my real-application, but when testing from a web browser, the browser itself is... so if I instead test from Fiddler, the request will be more pure and not include the "KeepAlive" header. So that is what I'll try next. Plus, your suggestion of changing the "Service Down" setting to 'Reject' is also a very good idea. I am not the admin of the F5 balancer... so I have to schedule some time with the Admin to try these ideas. I'll try and let you know how things work out.

 

--

 

Lee