Forum Discussion
Albert_Lau_3094
Nimbostratus
Oct 02, 2009snatpool vs snat
Hi, I have a problem when specifying the snat before passing traffic to another virtual server.
The version using is 9.4.7
As below, I found that option 1 doesn't work, the source address remains unchanged, but option 2 works fine. Is it a normal behavior?
Thanks.
snatpool snatpool_10.10.10.10 {
members 10.10.10.10
}
rule iRule_1 {
when CLIENT_ACCEPTED {
snatpool snatpool_10.10.10.10 option 1
snat 10.10.10.10 option 2
virtual vs_2
}
}
- hoolio
Cirrostratus
Really dumb question, but... do you have a SNAT address in the SNAT pool? If you use the snatpool command and a standard pool (instead of the virtual command) does it work?
Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects