Forum Discussion
smp_86112
Cirrostratus
Mar 23, 2010Proper Trunk/Etherchannel LACP Configuration
I'm working with LACP and trunks for the first time on a 10.1.0 LTM box. I have read the TMOS Config Guide, and there is some ambiguity around the proper way to configure LACP between the trunk and the etherchannel on the switch.
First, is it better to have the Cisco run Active and the LTM Passive? Cisco Passive and LTM Active? Or both Active?
I (finally) have this working with the Cisco Active and the LTM Passive. But if I display the etherchannel details, the output shows the Cisco is sending "Slow LACPDUs". Network traces show that the frames are send at a frequency of ~7 seconds. Is there a way to increase this frequency?
The TMOS Config Guide states the LTM can send these LACP frames every second using a Short Timeout.
My preference is to send these frames every second. Assuming both sides should not be Active, that means the Cisco will need to run Passive.
Or should they both run Active? The TMOS Config Guide isn't clear on this. I'd appreciate your input.
- Just to make sure, What's your channel-protocol on the cisco port configured as?
- Hamish
Cirrocumulus
I run all mine (That have channels configured) as active/active. FWIW as a comparison we run some ESX servers with etherchannel too. They have to run on/on because ESX doesn't do LACP... We have no end of troubles with ESX (Because there's no way for the switch and the host to detect cabling errors). 0 problems with BigIP and LACP... - smp_86112
Cirrostratus
The interfaces are configured in active mode - this is the running config of one interface in the group: - Nice tip on the ESX servers...
- smp_86112
Cirrostratus
Thanks for asking. It seems to be working from my perspective. By that, I mean it is behaving how I would expect. We can shut one port in the channel without disruption, and shutting down both ports triggers VLAN Failsafe. This is the running config of the channel and both ports - we are not using tagged interfaces on the LTM side: - K, you should be fine if you're not looking to tag through the ports.... You may want to set it up as a trunk in case you have a need in the future for multiple vlans etc... That way you won't have to disturb production.. (if indeed it is)..
Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects