Forum Discussion
priority group not working
having priority group issue, where low priority group members are also receiving traffic though high priority group members are available. Please advise. Below is the VIP config
ltm virtual XXXXXX { destination 10.14.128.202:xprint-server fallback-persistence Beltdwc_srcaddr http-class { ULPRD_XXXX_HC ULPRD_XXXX_Crys_Rep_Doc_HC } ip-protocol tcp mask 255.255.255.255 persist { GroupXXXX_Cookie { default yes } } pool ULPRD_XXXXX_Rep_crys_doc_Pool profiles { http { } oneconnect { } stream { } tcp { } } rules { ULPRRewrite } snat automap vlans-disabled }
5 Replies
- What_Lies_Bene1
Cirrostratus
OK. Can you post the Pool configuration please, as that's where this feature is configured. Also, do you have any connection limits configured?
- spalande
Nacreous
There is no limit for connections. This VS has 2 pools. based on incoming URI it redirect to the pool. Below is the config for pool. priority group not working for both pool
Pool1
ltm pool ULPRD_Invoker_Pool { load-balancing-mode least-connections-member members { 10.20.153.164:trivnet2 { address 10.20.153.164 priority-group 3 session monitor-enabled state up } 10.20.153.164:8202 { address 10.20.153.164 priority-group 3 session monitor-enabled state up } 10.20.153.164:8203 { address 10.20.153.164 priority-group 3 session user-disabled state up } 10.20.153.164:lm-perfworks { address 10.20.153.164 priority-group 3 session monitor-enabled state down } 10.20.89.167:trivnet2 { address 10.20.89.167 priority-group 1 session user-disabled state user-down } 10.20.89.167:8202 { address 10.20.89.167 priority-group 1 session user-disabled state up } 10.20.89.167:8203 { address 10.20.89.167 priority-group 1 session user-disabled state up } 10.20.89.167:lm-perfworks { address 10.20.89.167 priority-group 1 session monitor-enabled state down } } min-active-members 2 monitor tcp}
Pool2
ltm pool ULPRD_XXXX_Rep_crys_doc_Pool { members { 10.20.153.164:xprint-server { address 10.20.153.164 priority-group 5 session monitor-enabled state up } 10.20.89.167:xprint-server { address 10.20.89.167 priority-group 3 session user-disabled state user-down } } min-active-members 1 monitor tcp}
- Christopher_Boo
Cirrostratus
If the lower priority group was previously activated, traffic would continue to flow due to persistence even when higher priority group members become available.
- nathe
Cirrocumulus
spalan,
Two things to add with Priority Group. I believe existing open TCP connections will be maintained on the lower priority pool member, even if the higher priority ones are back in play. Also, persistence will override this selection to so you need to ensure there is no Cookie on a client and/or source addr persistence entry.
Hope this helps a bit,
N
- spalande
Nacreous
Thanks Nathan for the response. But lower priority pool was never active. Even I tried removing persistence profile and also deleted the connection entry. But still issue persists. I had to made members forced offline to direct traffic to high priority memeber
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com