Forum Discussion
pool member monitor versus pool monitor
Not sure if this behavior has changed now. When I apply node-specific monitor and NOT pool monitor, my pool remains blue. Shouldn't pool be green if each member in node-view shows each member green?
Does it mean there is one monitoring going on for each node from node-monitor perspective and another monitoring going on from pool's perspective?
Here are my definitions:
ltm pool prd-pl-vsp_mdm {
members {
prd-pl-vsp1:any {
address 172.26.225.100
priority-group 1
session monitor-enabled
state up
}
prd-pl-vsp2:any {
address 172.26.225.101
session monitor-enabled
state up
}
}
min-active-members 1
monitor Server-Monitor-8443
}
ltm node prd-pl-vsp1 {
address 172.26.225.100
monitor Server-Monitor-8443
session monitor-enabled
state up
}
ltm node prd-pl-vsp2 {
address 172.26.225.101
monitor Server-Monitor-8443
session monitor-enabled
state up
}
Thanks.
- epaalxJan 11, 2018Cirrus
> Does it mean there is one monitoring going on for each node from node-monitor perspective and another monitoring going on from pool's perspective?
Yes.
Although counter-intuitive, even if a node's monitor detects node as unavailable, LTM will continue to monitor the member using monitor defined in the pool - see K7118.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com