Forum Discussion
Partitions and route domains?
Can anyone please let me know if there are any issues for this type of design? Will I face any issues in the long run in terms of failover?
- Ferg_104721NimbostratusHave you had a read of
- AjayPra_161698Nimbostratus
Hi sandevsingh ,
Did you implement this as you stated in your post ??
Any issues you faced .
I am planning for same type of setup.
Regards
- sandy16AltostratusHi Struggler, we did not go with this design. In my opinion, only use route domains/RD if you have overlapping ip addresses. (In case of multi-tenancy setup). When I was trying to implement this, I found out that you can have only 1 RD per partition. There is a one-to-one relationship between a RD and a partition. So we decided to skip this altogether, just to make things simple.
- AjayPra_161698NimbostratusOk Thanks for your feedback.. i am planning to create 3 route domains in common partition . I will have single HA vlan between two LTM pair in default route-domain 0. I will create three traffic-groups and bind those with respective route-domains . Regards
- AjayPra_161698NimbostratusIt may be the version issue . I have seen posts here in Devcentral where people created multiple route domains in common partition
- AjayPra_161698Nimbostratus
Following is the note in the documentation:
If you want to segment traffic into multiple route domains, you can create additional route domains in partition Common and then segment application traffic among those route domains. http://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_ltm/manuals/product/tmos-ip-routing-administration-11-2-0/2.html
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com