Forum Discussion

FAJUMO's avatar
FAJUMO
Icon for Cirrus rankCirrus
Jul 18, 2023
Solved

Multiple Port Load Balancing

We have 3 IPS load Balanced with 2 ports 192.168.1.20 port 8080 192.168.1.21 port 8080 192.168.1.22 port 8080 VS 192.168.20.211 port 8080   192.168.1.20 port 7080 192.168.1.21 port 7080 192.1...
application delivery
  • Paulius's avatar
    Paulius
    Jul 19, 2023

    FAJUMO I don't believe it can be included in the DNS response but in order to use both 8080 and 7080 you would need to have the following.

    http://192.168.20.211:8080/UniCAPAdmin/layout# 

    http://192.168.20.211:7080/UniCAPAdmin/layout# 

    You could configure an 80 virtual server that balances to both the 8080 and 7080 and then an iRule on each one that performs a redirect to 8080 or 7080 depending on which virtual server you end up being balanced to in the pool for the 80 virtual server.

Paulius's avatar
Paulius
Icon for MVP rankMVP
Jul 18, 2023

FAJUMO You have verified that VS on 192.168.20.211 on port 7080 does have statistics showing it's being used? It's possible that you have persistence configured with "Match Across Pools" if you are not seeing the port 7080 pool pool members with zero statistics at all. You can apply an iRule to the virtual server in question and put a logging line similar to the following to see where the traffic is ultimately being sent that comes in on port 7080.

when LB_SELECTED {
    log local0. "LB INFO - Client: [IP::remote_addr], Port: [TCP::remote_port], Pool: [LB::server]"
}