Forum Discussion
frank_thyes_309
Nimbostratus
NimbostratusLTM with BGP route advertisement
One more question to the group. Two Cisco router and a pair of LTMs in a dual homed environment. Each Cisco has it's own uplink. All four devices communicate internal using iBGP, virtual servers are ...
What_Lies_Bene1
Cirrostratus
CirrostratusOK, here's some more questions;
1) Anything in the /var/log/zebos.log and /var/log/daemon.log files?
2) When you do a 'show ip route' on node 1 does it show node 2 as the best path for the .209 SNAT address?
3) Can you get any more detailed output from show ip bgp x.x.x.x command that might explain the preference for node 2?
4) This from the ARM manual: "When using BGP, RIP, or IS-IS, both units of the redundant system automatically advertise their shared, floating self IP address as the next hop for all advertised routes. This ensures that peer routers use the shared self IP address as the next hop for all routes advertised by the BIG-IP system." - You're output suggests this isn't the case? Is there no Floating IP?
