For more information regarding the security incident at F5, the actions we are taking to address it, and our ongoing efforts to protect our customers, click here.

Forum Discussion

epaalx's avatar
epaalx
Icon for Cirrus rankCirrus
Nov 01, 2012

LTM as a router proposal

Hi F5'ers,   My organisation implements a number of LTM "instances" (physically, same LTM but with a number of Router Domains) used as packet forwarders, implemented by "ip forward" type VSs, allo...
config
design
nitass's avatar
nitass
Icon for Employee rankEmployee
Nov 01, 2012
Is this not better?i think it is okay but since there is no connection entry, you have to enable virtual server on both vlan (request and response). so, the return traffic can pass through properly.

 

 

by the way, don't you also enable loose close?