Forum Discussion
Yaniv_99962
Nimbostratus
Jul 13, 2011"Layer 1" load balancing
Hi, Is it possible to simply define physical ports (interfaces) as group members so that a load balancing decision will force a a certain traffic/connection/packet to be persistently sent vi...
Yaniv_99962
Nimbostratus
Jul 14, 2011But the point is that Ii don't want the F5 to change anything in the packet including the MAC address...
Imagine the F5 connected via a 4 interfaces trunked together to a another router which will be the next hop.
on each of those 4 cables there is a "tapper" that just looks at the packets (it doesn't bridge or route them, just observes them).
Sound like using a trunk with a desired 'Frame Distribution Hash' can actually be the solution. However in case one of those 4 cables fails I don't want the entire remaining 3 cables to rehash, just the failed server.
For example:
I have 4 bump-in-the-wire servers on each of the 4 cables in the trunk.
user with IP 1.1.1.1 under normal circumstances goes via cable 1 and user with IP 2.2.2.2 under normal circumstances goes via cable 2.
Now server on cable 1 fails, I want that 1.1.1.1 will be moved to one of the other 3 cables but I don't want 2.2.2.2 to move from cable 2 to any other cable (as cable 2 didn't fail)
Normal trunk can't achieve that...
I need something like the CARP algorithm just that the group members will be physical interfaces rather than IP entities.
Hope it's clear....
Yaniv
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects
