Forum Discussion
L3 Port-channel connectivity with F5
Is it a best/standard practice to configure a switch connected to F5 with a L3 port-channel on switch side ? something similar to router on a stick with vlans allowed on f5 and L3 port-channel sub-interfaces (dot1q) on switch side ?
Or it must be a L2 portchannel with vlans passed on this trunk port ?
Thanks, AR
- Hannes_Rapp
Nimbostratus
Wherever possible, use dot1q. There are 4 functions you need to decide cabling for. (In brackets is how I'd go about it):
- HA (dot1q Direct connection to other BigIP)
- Client-side traffic (dot1q Connected to external NS stack)
- Server-side traffic (dot1q Connected to internal NS stack. Can be the same link as 2 if there's just one NS stack)
- Mgmt (standalone)
If you have security-conscious network setup, you have internal and external network switch stacks. In that case, you would end up with 3 aggregated dot1q links, and one standalone link for Mgmt. If you have a budget setup, you will end up with 2 aggregated dot1q links and one standalone link for Mgmt. In that scenario, Client-side and Server-side traffic is transmitted via the the same network switch stack.
You can take my answer in thread below as the base, and adjust as needed https://devcentral.f5.com/questions/how-to-setup-f5-ltm-ha-network-57397
How many interfaces you bundle in a dot1q trunk (2 or 4) depends on your throughput requirements. For the HA trunk, 2 is always enough - there you only want the dot1q for that extra fault tolerance, extra throughput is not relevant.
Regards,
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com