Forum Discussion
Is static self-IP necessary for WAN connection in a cluster setup ?
Why not use one internal subnet for point to point connection from your ISP router to your BigIPs? I.e. Network 192.168.0.0/24 can operate in place of 118.201.75.220/30 and you will not miss out on anything, unless you have a valid reason to maintain full BGP routing table in that BigIP cluster. Basically your ISP is wasting 3 usable public IP addresses to allocate you one useful address. You could potentially cut your ISP costs if you asked for a single routed IP solution instead of current proposal.
If you want to go with what is on the network diagram - you do need a local-only SelfIP on each unit. It's a pre-requisite to configure Floating SelfIP. BUT there's no significance for device operation if you populate these local-only SelfIPs with IP addresses that your ISP will not route in the Internet for you. So you can populate your BigIP 01 local-only SelfIP with 118.201.75.217/29 and BigIP 02 local-only SelfIP with 118.201.75.218/29. Confirm this wish with your ISP.
Hi Hannes,
Thanks for your reply.
The segment right now between the ISP and F5 is a /30 network namely 118.201.75.221 and 118.201.75.222
I understand I will need to create a static self-ip before creating a floating one.
Can I somehow "trick" F5 by creating a static self-ip .e.g 118.201.75.220/29 but in actual fact this IP/29 was not assigned by the ISP to us. (we are only allocated a /30)
Since the ISP is routing to us using the .222/30 IP as its next hop, and i have configured .222 as a floating IP, communication from and to device will use .222/30 IP which is valid.
Will there be any implication then since the "fake" static self-ip (118.201.75.220/29 in this case) is never actually in use ?
Regards,
Noob
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
