iRule to mimic Cisco ACL for Forwarding VIP

Hi Aaron,

 

 

I found out that if leave out the "forward" command from the irule, it works for both forwarding VIPS and port-specific VIPS. I guess this means that I can use the same irule for both forwarding and port-specific VIPS without including the "forward" command in the irule. Is this generally a good thing to do???

 

 

Without the "forward" command, the request will goto the VIP's deafult pool and I guess if there isn't a pool configured, it will use the routing table - is this a correct assumption???

 

 

Thanks.

 

 

Andy