Forum Discussion
Nimbostratushow multiple applications route through F5 using single irule.
If we have “abc.com” & “xyz.com” two url’s those are published through F5 on 443 port with same virtual server IP. Case 1:- If any request hits to virtual IP it should redirect to 8080 pool & Case 2:- If "/CVwebap" word comes in URL it should route to 9090 pool. How i can write irule of same?
8 Replies
nitass_89166Noctilucent
i understand you are using the irule Cory suggested (https://devcentral.f5.com/questions/how-we-can-publish-multiple-applications-on-same-vip-with-same-port-same-iruleanswer93113)
have you captured traffic to see what the wrong is?
sol10209: Overview of packet tracing with the ssldump utility
http://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/10000/200/sol10209.html
mayur_m_150368yes but still i have unclear that irule is not work for me. Do you have any other irule where i can resolve my issue?
- nitass
Employee
i understand you are using the irule Cory suggested (https://devcentral.f5.com/questions/how-we-can-publish-multiple-applications-on-same-vip-with-same-port-same-iruleanswer93113)
have you captured traffic to see what the wrong is?
sol10209: Overview of packet tracing with the ssldump utility
http://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/solutions/public/10000/200/sol10209.html- mayur_m_150368yes but still i have unclear that irule is not work for me. Do you have any other irule where i can resolve my issue?
- nitass
yes but still i have unclear that irule is not work for me. Do you have any other irule where i can resolve my issue?
i do not see any obvious wrong in the irule. if i were you, i would find out what the wrong is first. so, it can be fixed.
just my 2 cents.
- mayur_m_150368i argee that irule have no issue. because if i splits this irule into parts like if i use only ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- when HTTP_REQUEST { SSL::disable if { [string tolower[HTTP::uri]] contains "cvapweb" } { pool abc_9090 } else { pool abc_8080 } } } it works. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- but if i use below one, when HTTP_REQUEST { SSL::disable if { [string tolower [HTTP::host]] equals "abc.com" } { if { [string tolower[HTTP::uri]] contains "cvapweb" } { pool abc_9090 } else { pool abc_8080 } } } it is not working... it only shows till security page beyond that it is not going. why is so??
- nitass_89166
yes but still i have unclear that irule is not work for me. Do you have any other irule where i can resolve my issue?
i do not see any obvious wrong in the irule. if i were you, i would find out what the wrong is first. so, it can be fixed.
just my 2 cents.
- mayur_m_150368i argee that irule have no issue. because if i splits this irule into parts like if i use only ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- when HTTP_REQUEST { SSL::disable if { [string tolower[HTTP::uri]] contains "cvapweb" } { pool abc_9090 } else { pool abc_8080 } } } it works. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- but if i use below one, when HTTP_REQUEST { SSL::disable if { [string tolower [HTTP::host]] equals "abc.com" } { if { [string tolower[HTTP::uri]] contains "cvapweb" } { pool abc_9090 } else { pool abc_8080 } } } it is not working... it only shows till security page beyond that it is not going. why is so??
