F5 is upgrading its customer support chat feature on My.F5.com. Chat support will be unavailable from 6am-10am PST on 1/20/26. Refer to K000159584 for details.

Forum Discussion

J_Peterman_4266's avatar
J_Peterman_4266
Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
Jul 18, 2012

Having trouble with destination based SNAT irule

We are looking to implement destination based SNAT via iRule where all traffic destined to RFC 1918 space does not get SNAT outbound and it retains its private addressing, all other traffic destined t...
application delivery
dev
devops
iRules
hoolio's avatar
hoolio
Icon for Cirrostratus rankCirrostratus
Jul 20, 2012
Thanks for the example Brian. But I think it would be more efficient to strip the route domain off of the client IP and have a route domain-specific data group like in this example versus using string comparisons with switch.

 

 

https://devcentral.f5.com/Community/GroupDetails/tabid/1082223/asg/50/aft/1172490/showtab/groupforums/Default.aspx1173766

 

 

J, please do open a case and escalate the request for a fix. I've also spoken with development and asked them to increase the priority on supporting route domains in data groups.

 

 

Thanks, Aaron