Forum Discussion
J_Peterman_4266
Jul 18, 2012Nimbostratus
Having trouble with destination based SNAT irule
We are looking to implement destination based SNAT via iRule where all traffic destined to RFC 1918 space does not get SNAT outbound and it retains its private addressing, all other traffic destined t...
hooleylist
Jul 20, 2012Cirrostratus
Thanks for the example Brian. But I think it would be more efficient to strip the route domain off of the client IP and have a route domain-specific data group like in this example versus using string comparisons with switch.
https://devcentral.f5.com/Community/GroupDetails/tabid/1082223/asg/50/aft/1172490/showtab/groupforums/Default.aspx1173766
J, please do open a case and escalate the request for a fix. I've also spoken with development and asked them to increase the priority on supporting route domains in data groups.
Thanks, Aaron
Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects