Forum Discussion
Keith_Richards_
Nimbostratus
Aug 15, 2007GTM load balancing dilemma
I have an architecture where a GTM is load balancing a service between two data centres. The GTM uses iQuery to communicate with the LTMs in each data centre.
Now, the main Virtual Server on the LTMs passes traffic through some HTTP classes and ASM - but the key point is, the VS doesn't have a default pool specified for security. This means that the VS doesn't have a health status i.e. it is a blue square. This has implications on the GTM - it doesn't know if the VS is really there or not. What it can establish, however, is the number of connections to each VS and therefore intelligently load balance between the data centres.
What I have tried is to create a dummy Virtual Server that has a default pool containing the same web servers as the product VS, but listening on a dummy port. This doesn't affect the GTM of course because that only cares about the IP address. The problem now is that this method tells the GTM the availability of the data centre but NOT the number of connections!
Can anyone suggest a way of getting all the information at the GTM so that it is aware of both the connections and availability?
Thanks, Keith
- JRahm
Admin
If you virtual server is a single port, you could assign the bigip & tcp monitors at the virtual server level, then make sure the availability requirement is all health monitors. - hoolio
Cirrostratus
One other point... - Jerry_Tower_106Historic F5 AccountHave you tried creating a dependency in GTM, making primary VS availability dependent on dummy VS availability?
- Keith_Richards_
Nimbostratus
No, I wasn't aware that was possible. Can you elaborate? - Jerry_Tower_106Historic F5 AccountIt's an option that tells GTM to consider VS1 as available only if VS2 is also available. It's an option available in the GTM GUI, under Virtual Server definitions (change basic to advanced). I haven't used it to solve your particular problem myself, but I think it might do the trick for you. If it does work, let us know.
- Packeteer_69831
Nimbostratus
Sorry to bump up an old thread but I have something similar today with 11.5.3.
To anyone's knowledge has any progress been made in how to deal with GTM checking LTM VS status when the LTM VS doesn't have a default pool.
THanks.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects