Forum Discussion
brad_11440
Jan 15, 2009Nimbostratus
FastL4 vs Optimized TCP Profiles
We run active/standby 6400 (platform D63a) LTM's for our production applications. They are accessed via clients on a private network with an average latency around 80ms. Nearly all of our virtual se...
- Jan 20, 2009Maybe it's about the right time to have you post your VIP config from the bigip.conf. It's possible you have other settings applied to the VIP which conflict with a FastL4 profile??? Also it might be helpful to paste the values of the TCP profile you have applied.
brad_11440
Jan 16, 2009Nimbostratus
Thanks for the quick and detailed responses. Still though, I am not sure which one to use (FastL4 or Optimized). We are already moving a single VIP over to FastL4 on Tuesday morning. Doing so will put more of a burden on the physical servers themselves, correct ? That's why I am leaning towards using the optimized profile but obviously I want whatever is fastest and most efficient. Maybe after a week of running on FastL4, I'll see about switching it over to the TCP optimized profile to compare the results.... Thanks once again !
Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects