Forum Discussion
brad_11440
Jan 15, 2009Nimbostratus
FastL4 vs Optimized TCP Profiles
We run active/standby 6400 (platform D63a) LTM's for our production applications. They are accessed via clients on a private network with an average latency around 80ms. Nearly all of our virtual se...
- Jan 20, 2009Maybe it's about the right time to have you post your VIP config from the bigip.conf. It's possible you have other settings applied to the VIP which conflict with a FastL4 profile??? Also it might be helpful to paste the values of the TCP profile you have applied.
JRahm
Jan 16, 2009Admin
"Throttling down" is not a shortcoming in the product, it's really the LTM's tcp stack complying with the configuration in the system. I had a table in my tech tip on windows and buffers (http://devcentral.f5.com/Default.aspx?tabid=63&articleType=ArticleView&articleId=287 Click here) that presents a table that shows the practical max throughput numbers at various window sizes and latencies, and it's really shocking how poor throughput is when latency grows even a little bit, and that's not even taking into account loss. A small congestion window can really hamper a tcp sender's ability to deliver data due to the nature of tcp being a reliable transport protocol, which requires feedback from the receiver before pushing too much data at once.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects