Forum Discussion

brad_11440's avatar
brad_11440
Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
Jan 15, 2009

FastL4 vs Optimized TCP Profiles

We run active/standby 6400 (platform D63a) LTM's for our production applications. They are accessed via clients on a private network with an average latency around 80ms. Nearly all of our virtual se...
config
design
  • smp_86112's avatar
    smp_86112
    Jan 20, 2009
    Maybe it's about the right time to have you post your VIP config from the bigip.conf. It's possible you have other settings applied to the VIP which conflict with a FastL4 profile??? Also it might be helpful to paste the values of the TCP profile you have applied.

     

     

    Regarding the window size...the behavior you see was bothering me for a long time until it finally clicked in my brain. Yes, the TCP window size always starts at 4380. The trick is to understand whether the LTM is sending or receiving data. When the LTM is sending data, as in this case, there is no need for the LTM to increase its receive window - which is the parameter you refer to in the trace.

     

     

    When the LTM is receiving large amounts of data and you do a trace, you'll see that the LTM receive window starts out at 4380, and quickly increases to the value of the Receive Window as specified in the TCP profile that is applied.

     

     

    The LTM is smart - it starts out with a small window size so it does not need to allocate more memory than necessary for the TCP connection. If it needs to adjust the receive window (when it is receiving data), you'll see it go up.
JRahm's avatar
JRahm
Icon for Admin rankAdmin
Jan 15, 2009
your biggest help will be in the windowing and proxy buffers. To give you a real world, when I replaced a local director with the LTM, the performance dropped across the board, increasing the front page paints by 100% (yes, that bad). first thought was what the heck is wrong with this fancy new gear? Turns out nothing...the local director did nothing to TCP except port mapping and the web servers tcp stacks had been tuned. Well, the LTM is a full proxy, so all that tuning was now gone in reference to the client. Once we tuned the stack on the LTM, not only did performance come back in line across the board, but improved significantly in some areas with no noticable change in LTM performance. If you check the docs section of this site, I've been writing a series on the tcp profile