## Forum Discussion

zamroni777

Jan 04, 2024Nacreous

have you used ospf area setting based on adjacency in order to enable auto summarization?

this cisco docs explains some examples.

it's not f5 but the mechanism should be applicable

https://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=2294214&seqNum=3

- mlwebsterJan 04, 2024Cirrus
Hi,

the networks are all in the same area

pre super-netting (21 statements)

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/28 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/22 area n

networks 192.168.x.0/29 area n*here, the 192.168 subnet wasn’t advertised*post super-netting (12 statements)

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/24 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/20 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/21 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/28 area n

networks 10.x.x.0/22 area n

networks 192.168.x.0/29 area n

now working fineIf I was unable to super-net I’d need to use – I tested this before implementing the super-netting

*net.ipv4.igmp_max_memberships=25 (>20)*