Forum Discussion
Scott_C_16492
Nimbostratus
Sep 05, 2008Error Message
Hi
I was doing a test last night of taking one of my caching dns servers offline. The majority of dns goes via a LTM via the loadbalanced ip 10.15.10.155 (to .156 and .157).
...
Jesse_42849
Sep 05, 2008Historic F5 Account
Are you SNAT'ing inbound connections to the servers through the VIP to make them appear as a single address? If so, my first thought would be the near-complete utilization of ephemeral ports available for use by an inbound SNAT. This would lead to the SNAT being unable to handle additional connections until some source ports become available. You might not see this with multiple servers in the pool because the inbound connections are split between two servers, allowing each port to be used twice, once per internal server. When reduced to just one active server the inbound ephemeral port would be the only point of uniqueness among all inbound DNS requests and could not be used more than once.
If the above scenario is accurate you may be able to handle the issue with the following options: Since it's DNS traffic I'd make sure that the protocol timeout in the UDP profile assigned to the VIP is 2 to 5 seconds. If the problem continues I'd place the existing SNAT address into a SNAT pool with at least one other address, then assign the SNAT pool to this VIP.
If you are not SNAT'ing your inbound requests I would need more information about your config.
--jesse
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects