Forum Discussion
configuring trunk with Cisco Nexus 7000
Hello everybody,
I need help to an issue.... I’ve a network problem
about Viprion and Trunks. I configured a Trunk between a Cisco Nexus 7000 and a
BIGIP Viprion with Blade 100:
Trunk
Viprion config
Link Selection
Policy Auto
Frame distribution
hash Source/Destination MAC
address
Cisco
Nexus 7000 (Port Channel)
interface
port-channel50
description
Viprion-F5-Bil
shutdown
switchport
switchport mode
trunk
switchport trunk
allowed vlan 310,330,610,630
sh port-channel
load-balance
Port Channel
Load-Balancing Configuration:
System:
source-dest-ip-vlan
Port Channel
Load-Balancing Addresses Used Per-Protocol:
Non-IP:
source-dest-mac
IP:
source-dest-ip-vlan
interface
Ethernet1/25
description
Viprion
switchport
switchport mode
trunk
switchport trunk
allowed vlan 310,330,610,630
channel-group
50
no
shutdown
The interface
port-channel50 is in shutdown because it’s in a working mode and customer don’t
want to configuring anything, it’s a critical
environment..
So, we tested the
network traffic, the trunk on Viprion goes UP and (from Nexus to Viprion) if I
try to ping the self IP, it’s working, I can’t do the revert operation and I
can’s see the server on server farm.
Now I would to
understand if I need to setting only a LACP trunk, or it’s possible to configure
in another way?
What’s happen on the
Viprion if I configure a NO LACP Trunk? And what does happened with LACP
trunk?
Could you help me for
this?
Please tell me if you
need something else.
Thanks a
lot
Best
Regards
Fabrizio.
20 Replies
- Elias_O_16228
Nimbostratus
Yes, I have vPC on Po interfaces. Though the working ports can work with/out vPC. I'm still wondering why F5 say LACP with Cisco should be set PASSIVE/short/MAC address. It's working with active/long/IP address.
- Hamish
Cirrocumulus
The reasons for using a vPC are simply to avoid a site outage due to faiulure of >1 device... With a vPC yu can have EITHER switch or Viprion up & running.
FWIW it works fine when configured correctly. All my Viprions are vPC connected to dual Nexus 7010's using vPC's.
Hey Elias... You do have 1 trunk configured only on each Viprion don't you?
H
- Hamish
Cirrocumulus
OK. So my nexus config (Which works) is
interface port-channel202 description MAN: Viprion-1 20Gb channel switchport switchport mode trunk switchport trunk native vlan 1000 switchport trunk allowed vlan 105,108,1024-1255,2005-2006,2015-2016 switchport trunk allowed vlan add 4080,4086-4087 vpc 202And then on the interfaces
interface Ethernet4/18 description MAN: Viprion-1 10Gb int 1.1 switchport switchport mode trunk switchport trunk native vlan 1000 switchport trunk allowed vlan 105,108,1024-1255,2005-2006,2015-2016 switchport trunk allowed vlan add 4080,4086-4087 channel-group 202 mode active no shutdownThe other interface is of course connected to Nexus 2... That config is identical.
Then the Viprion is configured with a single 'trunk' (F5 Port-Channel).
When you do a 'sh vpc ' is it Status==Up and Consistency==Success?
- Elias_O_16228
Nimbostratus
well...well... well...
I wanted to provide feedback for the resolution of my problem. Hopefully, it will help someone down the line.
If you have ever resolved a problem by accident, I know I have. I found the problem to be channel-group id on port channel interface membership. The LTM channel-group number must be the same on both Nexus 7k. I was following the ASA port-group id style. I discovered by accident when one LTM was taken off, then I connected sinlge LTM to both nexus 7k, everything came up. Then I said dawn it. I brought the second LTM back and criss-crossed each everything worked fine. Solution: Each LTM must have identical channel-group number on each Nexus 7k. For ASA, this is not the case when you criss-cross connect.
- Brandon
Cirrostratus
So you have both channel groups set for 202?
- Hamish
Cirrocumulus
LTM's don't have channel-group id's... LTM's use a NAME to refer to a trunk (BigIP trunk == Cisco port-channel/channel-group).
Yeah, there's probably a cisco note somewhere that says the port-channel id has to equal the vPC ID...
TBH it wouldn't occur to be to use different one... Do ASA's even do vPC's? They barely do port-channels...
H
- pgmacdon_188019
Nimbostratus
One thing to note it's important that the F5 is set up for MIST (multi instance spanning tree), we got hit where a 10.4 device was still running single instance spanning tree (under network->spanning tree options). This was an artifact from when the box was running 9.x (which didn't support MIST), it was still set to single instance. When we added a newly created vlan to a trunk that terminates on a Nexus VPC (running MIST by default) went blocking, listening, leanrning, forwarding for all the vlans on the trunk causing a blip.
Phil
- Brian_Thompson
Nimbostratus
I would recommend letting your switch run span tree and leaving it disabled on the F5, have you considered that or am I missing something?
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
