Forum Discussion

jomedusa's avatar
jomedusa
Icon for Cirrus rankCirrus
Aug 18, 2026

Adding new rSeries Tenant to existing Device Group

We are refreshing our iSeries with rSeries hardware.  I have deployed the new Tenant for LTM and associated the proper VLANs and I see them in the new LTM but they are all in the Common Partition.  On the existing LTM's the VLANS are in their respective partitions.  I have case open with support and they provided guidance on adding the new device to the group to get the configuration synced.  

Can I get any suggestions from anyone that has already gone through this exercise?  I have a change request in for tonight to add this device to the group and I am concerned with the process.

 

Thanks,

 

Joe

1 Reply

  • mwolf's avatar
    mwolf
    Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus

    jomedusa​ 

    What I would likely do:

    1. Restore the rSeries to the factory configuration.
    2. Manually add the VLAN to the correct partitions.
    3. Then import all the other configuration. 

    Refreshing BIG-IP hardware is challenging. Every BIG-IP install is unique. 

    I never have been able to directly import the configuration from an older BIG-IP hardware platform on to a new BIG-IP hardware platform.  There are always issues with the configuration conversion. 

     

    Why do you need the VLAN configuration objects to be in child partitions / folders?

     

    My experience is that it's easier to support having all the VLAN in Common.  It's my general recommendation is to put all the VLAN in Common.

    A child partition of the parent Common partition should be able to use a VLAN object from Common.  

     

    I view partitions / folders as a multi tenancy feature.  When the BIG-IP device is being used in a single customer environment. Partitions can add unneeded complexity to the configuration. Some of the BIG-IP modules do not fully support partitions. 

     

    A good use for partitions is limiting remote user access to the BIG-IP. Pulting the VLAN in Common should not affect user access to the other configuration objects in a partition.

     

    Are you using a route domain for each partition to isolate traffic? In my mind this would be a justifiable reason to place the VLAN in the partition. 

     

    Matt