LTM - check if config was loaded from wrong HD partition during upgrade
Hello, we've had an issue recently where BIG-IP seemed to lose a part of configuration during an upgrade. Having worked a while with LTM I'm very suspicious that "install configuration" feature was used and wrong partition was selected. I've found a couple of logs that seem to confirm this already, with message ID 01420012:5: Loading schema version: 12.1.2 #version in 'spare' unused partition, not active 01420012:5: Loading schema version:14.1.4 #target version These two messages are logged at the same time, and doing some quick googling I believe the first one should reflect the partition config was installed from. Sadly I was not able to find details on event 01420012 in log messages reference (link) nor by googling into public KBs. Can someone confirm this actually is some good evidence for my suspect? Any help will be appreciated.The Reach of a Breach
It comes as no surprise that the CEO of Target has resigned in the wake of their massive data breach. The 2nd executive, if I remember correctly, to resign due to the mishap. Data breaches are costly according to the most recent Ponemon 2014 Cost of Data Breach Study: United States and the main reason for the steep increase in costs is 'the loss of customers following the data breach due to additional expenses required to preserve the organization's brand and reputation.' The cost of each lost or stolen record, on average, increased from $188 to $201 per record from 2012 to 2013 - a 9% increase. But that's not all, In 2013, there appeared to be 'an abnormal churn rate' of 15% of customers abandoning companies, especially those in financial services, hit by a breach says Ponemon. I'm always curious about that. I usually avoid stores that have been recently compromised wondering if something is lingering yet think, they gotta be on high alert, especially with law enforcement involved. Maybe it's as safe as it ever will be. A recent Courion survey of IT security executives showed that 78% of respondents say they're anxious about the possibility of a data breach at their organization. If there were a massive security breach at these companies, 58.8% said 'protecting the privacy of our customers' would be top priority and 62.7% would lament about 'negative publicity affecting the company brand' due to the breach. Maybe that's the problem. They're more worried about their image than they are of protecting our info. It's the 58.8% you want to shop at. Reaching for more, Symantec’s Internet Security Threat Report (ISTR), Volume 19, shows a big change in cybercriminal habits, revealing the bad guys are plotting for months before pulling off the huge heists – instead of popping quick hits with smaller bounty. One big is worth fifty small. In 2013, there was a 62% uptick in the number of data breaches exposing more than 552 million identities. That's about 10% of the planet's population, give-or-take. And finally, there have been a few companies that have gone out of business due to a leakage but a few months ago a data breach also closed some Seattle area Catholic schools. According to the Seattle Archdiocese, at least three Roman Catholic parishes and the Archdiocese’s chancery offices had been targeted by a tax-fraud scheme. In order to allow those who were victims time to contact the appropriate institutions during school hours, they cancelled classes. How's that for reach. ps Related: 2014 Cost of Data Breach Study (pdf) A Decade of Breaches Breaches expose 552 million identities in 2013 Data Breaches 9% More Costly in 2013 Than Year Before Why the Target Data Breach May Have Been a Great Thing, According to Wells Fargo & Co and Bank of America Corp Data Breaches: Worse for Your Image than a Dead Body in the Parking Lot 78 Percent of IT Security Execs Worry About Data Breaches Data breach to close some area Catholic schools Friday Technorati Tags: breach,target,data_loss,ponemon,security,identity theft,f5,silva Connect with Peter: Connect with F5:OK 2014, Now What
So I've been staring at this blinking cursor for the last 5 minutes wondering what story to tell. 'Once upon a time, there was a....' No that won't work. 'It was a dark and dreary night as our protagonist grudgingly dragged his feet toward the impending...' No, not that either. How about, 'The waves were big, mean and fast that day...the kind of day where Eddie would go.' Nah, too local boy. After a few weeks break and with so much going on within information technology, I sometimes find it difficult to zero in on something interesting with so many choices. So I decided to do a mini blog buffet....the best in town, I say! The big news this week seems to be the Consumer Electronics Show (CES). From connected and driverless cars to interactive kitchens to wearable technology to the massive ultra HD televisions to even toothbrushes, the internet of things is certainly posed to take over the world in 2014. There are, of course, risks with all these embedded systems. There was the Target breach right at the height of the holiday shopping season nailing 40 some million (now 70 million) credit and debit cards in the process. I had a browser tab The 10 Worst Data Breaches of 2013 saved since before the new year for an article but this most recent debacle will certainly make all of 2014's lists. I was in Target a couple days ago retuning something and the person in front of me was asked, 'Do you want cash or credited back on the card?' He dryly answered, 'Well, I got a letter from my bank this week saying they are replacing my card due to your breach, so I'll just take the cash.' Mine was an even exchange. There was the FireEye - Mandiant deal struck slightly before the ball dropped and announced after the 12th ding. Interesting blend of attack detection along with attack response. The timing seemed perfect in the wake of the Target news. There was the Snapchat breach, the Yahoo malware, the WoW attack and certainly all the 'national security' news. And finally, our very own John McAdam earned Puget Sound Business Journal Executive of the Year for 2013. I first met John when I joined F5 in 2004. We had less than 1000 employees at the time and our sales conference that year was at a local Seattle hotel. During one of the breaks, Ken Salchow took me over to introduce me to McAdam, who was sitting in a chair fiddling with his blackberry. Now you'd think that the first time meeting your CEO you'd be all proper, business-like...Sir. Not me. As Ken did the formalities, the first words out of my mouth were, 'What's your high score on brick breaker?' John's face lit up with a smile, a determination in his eye and without missing a beat, shoved his phone in my face and taunted, 'Can you beat that?' It was wonderful and crushing at the same time since his score trounced mine. This was well before internet on planes and playing brick breaker was a way to pass time in the air. For the next several months as we did our individual business travel, we would send each other our high score(s) wrapped in a bit of bragging. There was actually a few of us on the thread, all hoping to blast the others. Then one day, one of the competitors (who had been on an overseas flight if I remember correctly) sent a score that blew everyone away. That was it, game over. But I'll never forget how the CEO included a relatively new guy into a fun little group of folks trying to one up each other. I've been here ever since. Welcome to the Year of the Horse! ps Related: Top 10 products revealed at CES 2014 so far Customers paying the price after Target breach The 10 Worst Data Breaches of 2013 The Internet of Things and DNS Looking to 2014 Executive of Year: F5 Networks CEO John McAdam strikes the perfect balance Technorati Tags: 2014,breach,security,target,mcadam,f5,malware,ces,IoT,silva,attacks Connect with Peter: Connect with F5:
