Quantifying Reputation Loss From a Breach
#infosec #security Putting a value on reputation is not as hard as you might think… It’s really easy to quantify some of the costs associated with a security breach. Number of customers impacted times the cost of a first class stamp plus the cost of a sheet of paper plus the cost of ink divided by … you get the picture. Some of the costs are easier than others to calculate. Some of them are not, and others appear downright impossible. One of the “costs” often cited but rarely quantified is the cost to an organization’s reputation. How does one calculate that? Well, if folks sat down with the business people more often (the ones that live on the other side of the Meyer-Briggs Mountain) we’d find it’s not really as difficult to calculate as one might think. While IT folks analyze flows and packet traces, business folks analyze market trends and impacts – such as those arising from poor customer service. And if a breach of security isn’t interpreted by the general populace as “poor customer service” then I’m not sure what is. While traditionally customer service is how one treats the customer, increasingly that’s expanding to include how one treats the customer’s data. And that means security. This question “how much does it really cost” is one Jeremiah Grossman asks fairly directly in a recent blog, “Indirect Hard Losses”: As stated by InformationWeek regarding a Ponemon Institute study on the Cost of a Data Breach, “Customers, it seems, lose faith in organizations that can't keep data safe and take their business elsewhere.” The next logical question is how much? Jeremiah goes on to focus on revenue lost from web transactions after a breach and that’s certainly part of the calculation, but what about those losses that might have been but now will never be? How can we measure not only the loss of revenue (meaning a decrease in first-order customers) but the potential loss of revenue? That’s harder, but just as important as it more accurately represents the “reputation loss” often mentioned in passing but never assigned a concrete value (at least not publicly, some industries discretely share such data with trusted members of the same industry, but seeing these numbers in the wild? Good luck!) HERE COMES the ALMOST SCIENCE 20% of the businesses that lost data lost customers as a direct result. The impacts were most severe for companies with more than 100 employees. Almost half of them lost sales. Rubicon Survey One of the first things we have to calculate is influence, as that directly impacts reputation. It is the ability of even a single customer to influence a given number of others (negatively or positively) that makes up reputation. It’s word of mouth, what people say about you, after all. If we turn to studies that focus more on marketing and sales and businessy things, we can find a lot of this data. It’s a well-studied area. One study 1 indicates that the reach of a single dissatisfied customer will tell approximately 8-16 people. Each of those people has a circle of influence of about 250, with 25 of those being within an organization's primary target audience. Of all those told 2% (1 in 50) will defect or avoid an organization upon hearing of the victim's dissatisfaction. So for every angry customer, the reputation impact is a loss of anywhere from 40-80 customers, existing and future. So much for thinking 100 records stolen in a breach is small potatoes, eh? Thousands of existing and potential customers loss is nothing to sneeze at. Now, here’s where it gets a little harder, because you’re going to have to talk to the businessy folks to get some values to attach to those losses. See, there’s two numbers you need yet: customer lifetime value (CLV) and the cost to replace a customer (which is higher than the cost of acquire a customer, but don’t ask me why, I’m not a businessy folk). Customer values are highly dependent upon industry. For example, based on 2010 FDIC data, the industry average annual customer value for a banking customer is $209 2 . Facebook’s annual revenue per user (ARPU) is estimated at $2.00 3 . Estimates claim Google makes $9.85 annually off each Android user 4 . And Zynga’s ARPU is estimated at $3.96 (based on a reported $0.33 monthly per user revenue) 5 . This is why you actually have to talk to the businessy guys, they know what these values are and you’ll need them to plug in to the influence calculation to come up with a at-least-it’s-closer-than-guessing value. You also need to ask what the average customer lifetime is, so you can calculate the loss from dissatisfied and defecting customers. Then you just need to start plugging in the numbers. Remember, too, that it’s a model; an estimate. It’s not a perfect valuation system, but it should give you some kind of idea of what the reputational impact from a breach would be, which is more than most folks have today. Even if you can’t obtain the cost to replace value, try the model without it. Try a small breach, just for fun, say of 100 records. Let’s use $4.00 as an annual customer value and a lifetime of ten years as an example. Affected Customer Loss: 100 * ($4 *10) = $4000 Influenced Customer Loss: 100 * (40) = 4000 * 40 = $160,000 Total Reputation Cost: $164,000 Adding in the cost to replace can only make this larger and serves very little purpose except to show that even what many consider a relatively small breach (in terms of records lost) can be costly. WHY is THIS VALUABLE? The reason this is valuable is two-fold. First, it serves as the basis for a very logical and highly motivating business case for security solutions designed to prevent breaches. The problem with much of security is it’s intangible and incalculable. It is harder to put monetary value to risk than it is to put monetary value on solutions. Thus, the ability to perform a cost-benefit analysis that is based in part on “reputation loss” is difficult for security professionals and IT in general. The business needs to be able to justify investments, and to do that they need hard-numbers that they can balance against. It is the security professionals who so often are called upon to explain the “risk” of a breach and loss of data to the business. By providing them tangible data based on accepted business metrics and behavior offers them a more concrete view of the costs – in money – of a breach. That gives IT the leverage, the justification, for investing in solutions such as web application firewalls and vulnerability scanning services that are designed to detect and ultimately prevent such breaches from occurring. It gives infosec some firm ground upon which stand and talk in terms the business understands: dollar signs. [1] PUTTING A PRICE TAG ON A LOST CUSTOMER [2] Free Checking and Debit Incentives Post-Durbin [3] Facebook’s Annual Revenue Per User [4] Each Android User Will Make Google $9.85 per Year in 2012 [5] Zynga Doubled ARPU From Last Year Even as Facebook Platform Changes Slowed GrowthIs 2015 Half Empty or Half Full?
With 2015 crossing the half way point, let's take a look at some technology trends thus far. Breaches: Well, many databases are half empty due to the continued rash of intrusions while the crooks are half full with our personal information. Data breaches are on a record pace this year and according to the Identity Theft Resource Center (ITRC), there have been 400 data incidents as of June 30, 2015. One more than this time last year. And, 117,576,693 records had been compromised. ITRC also noted a 85% increase in the number of breaches within the banking sector. From health care to government agencies to hotel chains to universities and even Major League Baseball, breaches and attacks are now a daily occurrence. Cloud: Who would've thought back in 2008 that this cloud thing would now be half full? Over the last couple years, the 'cloud' has become a very viable option for organizations large and small. It is becoming the platform for IoT and many organizations such as Google and GE are now moving critical corporate applications to the cloud. While hybrid is the new normal remember, The Cloud is Still just a Datacenter Somewhere. DNS: While IPv4 addresses are now completely empty, DNS seems to be half to almost full in 2015. DNS continues to be a target for attackers along with being an enabler for IoT. It is so important that Cisco recently acquired OpenDNS to help fight IoT attacks and the courts got a guilty plea from an Estonian man who altered DNS settings on infected PCs with the DNSChanger malware. I think of DNS as a silent sufferer - you really don't care about it until it doesn't work. Start caring this year. Internet: Full but still growing. As noted above, IPv4 addresses are gone. Asia, Europe, Latin America and now North America have run out of IPv4 addresses and have exhausted their supplies. If you're wondering how to handle this glass, F5 has some awesome 4to6 and 6to4 solutions. IoT: Things, sensors and actuators are all the buzz and are certainly half full for 2015. At this time last year, IoT was at the top of the Gartner Hype Cycle and it has certainly not disappointed. Stories abound about Internet of Things Security Risks and Challenges, 10 of the biggest IoT data generators, the Top 10 Worst Wearable Tech Devices So Far, The (Far-Flung) Future Of Wearables, along with the ability to Smell Virtual Environments and if We Need Universal Robot Rights, Ethics And Legislation. RoboEthics, that is. Mobile: We are mobile, our devices are mobile and the applications we access are now probably mobile also. Mobility, in all it's connotations, is a huge concern for enterprises and it'll only get worse as we start wearing our connected clothing to the office. The Digital Dress Code has emerged. Mobile is certainly half full and there is no empting it now. Privacy: At this point with all the surveillance, data breaches, gadgets gathering our daily data and our constant need to tell the world what we're doing every second, this is probably bone dry. Pardon, half empty, sticking to the theme. That's what I got so far and I'm sure 2015's second half will bring more amazement, questions and wonders. We'll do our year in reviews and predictions for 2016 as we all lament, where did 2015 go? There is that old notion that if you see a glass half full, you're an optimist and if you see it half empty you are a pessimist. Actually, you need to understand what the glass itself was before the question. Was it empty and filled half way or was it full and poured out? There's you answer! ps Related: It's all contained within the blog. Technorati Tags: f5,breach,security,cloud,dns,iot,mobile,2015,silva,empty or full Connect with Peter: Connect with F5:Infographic: Protect Yourself Against Cybercrime
Maybe I’ll start doing an ‘Infographic Friday’ to go along with Lori’s F5 Friday. This one comes to us from Rasmussen College's School of Technology and Design Cyber Security Program and shows the online risks and offers some good tips on how to better protect your computer and avoid being a victim of cybercrime. psThe Breach of Things
Yet another retailer has confessed that their systems were breached and an untold number of victims join the growing list of those who have had their data was stolen. This one could be bigger than the infamous Target breach. I wonder if some day we'll be referring to periods of time by the breach that occurred. 'What? You don't remember the Target breach of '13! Much smaller than the Insert Company Here Breach of 2019!' Or almost like battles of a long war. 'The Breach of 2013 was a turning point in the fight against online crime,' or some other silly notion. On top of that, a number of celebrity's private photos, stored in the cloud (of course), were privately stolen. I'm sorry but if you are going to take private pictures of yourself with something other than a classic Polaroid, someone else will eventually see them. Almost everything seems breach'able these days. Last year, the first toilet was breached. The one place you'd think you would have some privacy has also been soiled. Add to that televisions, thermostats, refrigerators and automobiles. And a person's info with a dangerous hug. Companies are sprouting up all over to offer connected homes where owners can control their water, temperature, doors, windows, lights and practically any other item, as long as it has a sensor. Won't be long until we see sensational headlines including 'West Coast Fridges Hacked...Food Spoiling All Over!' or 'All Eastern Televisions Hacked to Broadcast old Gilligan's Island Episodes!' As more things get connected, the risks of a breach obviously increase. The more I thought about it, I felt it was time to resurrect this dandy from 2012: Radio Killed the Privacy Star for those who may have missed it the first time. Armed with a mic and a midi, I belt out, karaoke style, my music video ‘Radio Killed the Privacy Star.’ Lyrics can be found at Radio Killed the Privacy Star. Enjoy. ps Related The Internet of Sports Is IoT Hype For Real? Internet of Things OWASP Top 10 Uncle DDoS'd, Talking TVs and a Hug Welcome to the The Phygital World The DNS of Things Technorati Tags: breach,things,iot,data,privacy,target,photos,f5,silva,security,video Connect with Peter: Connect with F5:Bricks (Thru the Window) and Mortar (Rounds)
...or I've been Breached. There was a time when people differentiated between stealing from a physical store and pilfering data from a network. Throughout the years there have been articles talking about the safety/risks of shopping online vs. shopping at a retail outlet. You could either get carjacked in the parking lot and have your wallet stolen on Black Friday or your browser hijacked and your digital identity stolen on Cyber Monday. There are probably many people who exclusively shop one way or another due to their own risk assessment of each...ignoring whatever convenience, interaction, price, constraints, gratification, availability or any other perceived beneficial metric on the Franklin T-scale tied to the specific activity. Now we've learned that the recent Target breach was due to malware being installed on the point of sale devices. Wait, what? A 'cyber' crime within a retail bricks environment? Isn't anything sacred? Well no, and this is really not anything new. ATMs and point of sale devices have been targets for a while due to the simple fact that they run on an operating system. A potentially vulnerable operating system. In 2012, thieves broke into Barnes and Noble's keypads and grabbed a bunch of credit cards. Subway also had it's PoS devices infiltrated. There will be more. Online shopping has risen 300% since 2004 and continues to grow. comScore reports that desktop sales on Black Friday grew 21% ($1.1 Billion) and Cyber Monday grew 18% ($1.7 billion). Yet, with all the mouse orders we accomplish on any given day, according to the Dept. of Commerce, it still only amounts to 6% of all U.S. retail sales. You'd think that it would be much higher but major purchases, like automobiles for instance, are still (mostly) purchased in person. The shift, however, will certainly grow as more people rely on mobile as a primary purchase sidekick and... as always, the bad guys are going to focus on where they can get their take. In this interesting TED talk, security expert Mikko Hypponen says that we are more likely to be a victim of an online crime than a real world stick up. That includes an increase of blended attacks. We've seen it a thousand times - plant something on the inside and siphon from the outside; launch a network based attack as a diversion to go after the app data; do a little social engineering surveillance to become one of them; and of course the classic, knock out the guards, put on their outfits and walk in while nobody notices. There is still much to uncover about this latest breach but I can't help feeling that more retailers, as has been reported, will be screaming, 'This PoS device is a PoS! Nice how I worked that in huh? ps Related: Target Security Breach A Reminder That Threat Lurks In Stores And Online Online retail still very small compared to brick and mortar The Ultimate Debate: Online Shopping vs. Brick and Mortar Shopping Cybercriminals targeting point-of-sale devices ATM and Point-of-Sale Terminals Malware: The Bad Guys Just Never Stop! Technorati Tags: breach,security,point of sale,pos,target,brick mortar,silva Connect with Peter: Connect with F5:The Reach of a Breach
It comes as no surprise that the CEO of Target has resigned in the wake of their massive data breach. The 2nd executive, if I remember correctly, to resign due to the mishap. Data breaches are costly according to the most recent Ponemon 2014 Cost of Data Breach Study: United States and the main reason for the steep increase in costs is 'the loss of customers following the data breach due to additional expenses required to preserve the organization's brand and reputation.' The cost of each lost or stolen record, on average, increased from $188 to $201 per record from 2012 to 2013 - a 9% increase. But that's not all, In 2013, there appeared to be 'an abnormal churn rate' of 15% of customers abandoning companies, especially those in financial services, hit by a breach says Ponemon. I'm always curious about that. I usually avoid stores that have been recently compromised wondering if something is lingering yet think, they gotta be on high alert, especially with law enforcement involved. Maybe it's as safe as it ever will be. A recent Courion survey of IT security executives showed that 78% of respondents say they're anxious about the possibility of a data breach at their organization. If there were a massive security breach at these companies, 58.8% said 'protecting the privacy of our customers' would be top priority and 62.7% would lament about 'negative publicity affecting the company brand' due to the breach. Maybe that's the problem. They're more worried about their image than they are of protecting our info. It's the 58.8% you want to shop at. Reaching for more, Symantec’s Internet Security Threat Report (ISTR), Volume 19, shows a big change in cybercriminal habits, revealing the bad guys are plotting for months before pulling off the huge heists – instead of popping quick hits with smaller bounty. One big is worth fifty small. In 2013, there was a 62% uptick in the number of data breaches exposing more than 552 million identities. That's about 10% of the planet's population, give-or-take. And finally, there have been a few companies that have gone out of business due to a leakage but a few months ago a data breach also closed some Seattle area Catholic schools. According to the Seattle Archdiocese, at least three Roman Catholic parishes and the Archdiocese’s chancery offices had been targeted by a tax-fraud scheme. In order to allow those who were victims time to contact the appropriate institutions during school hours, they cancelled classes. How's that for reach. ps Related: 2014 Cost of Data Breach Study (pdf) A Decade of Breaches Breaches expose 552 million identities in 2013 Data Breaches 9% More Costly in 2013 Than Year Before Why the Target Data Breach May Have Been a Great Thing, According to Wells Fargo & Co and Bank of America Corp Data Breaches: Worse for Your Image than a Dead Body in the Parking Lot 78 Percent of IT Security Execs Worry About Data Breaches Data breach to close some area Catholic schools Friday Technorati Tags: breach,target,data_loss,ponemon,security,identity theft,f5,silva Connect with Peter: Connect with F5:Will the Cloud Soak Your Fireworks?
This week in the States, the Nation celebrates it's Independence and many people will be attending or setting off their own fireworks show. In Hawaii, fireworks are shot off more during New Year's Eve than on July 4th and there is even Daytime Fireworks now. Cloud computing is exploding like fireworks with all the Oooooooo's and Ahhhhhhh's of what it offers but the same groan, like the traffic jam home, might be coming to an office near you. Recently, Ponemon Institute and cloud firm Netskope released a study Data Breach: The Cloud Multiplier Effect, indicating that 613 IT and security professionals felt that deploying resources in the cloud triples the probability of a major breach. Specifically, a data breach with 100,000+ customer records compromised, the cost would be just over $20 million, based on Ponemon Institute’s May 2014 'Cost of a Data Breach'. With a breach of that scale, using cloud services may triple the risk of a data breach. It's called the 'cloud multiplier effect' and it translates to a 3% higher risk of a data breach for every 1% increase in the use of cloud services. So if you had 100 cloud services, you would only need to add 25 more to increase the possibility of a data breach by 75%, according to the study. 69% of the respondents felt that their organizations are not proactive in assessing what data is too sensitive to be stored in the cloud and 62% said that the cloud services their companies are using are not fully tested to make sure they are secure. Most, almost three-quarters, believed they would not even be notified of a breach that involved lost or stolen intellectual property/business confidential or even customer data. Not a lot of confidence there. The security respondents felt around 45% of all software applications used by the company were cloud based yet half of those had no IT visibility. This comes at a time when many organizations are looking to the cloud to solve a bunch of challenges. At the same time, this sounds a lot like the cloud concerns of year's past - security and risk - plus this is the perception of...not necessarily the reality of what's actually occurring. It very well could be the case - with all the parts, loss of control, out in the wild, etc - that the risk is greater. And I think that's the point. The risk. While cloud does offer organizations amazing opportunities, what these people are saying is that companies need to do a better job at the onset, in the beginning and during the evaluations, to understand the risk of the type(s) of data getting sent to the cloud along with the specific cloud service that holds it. It has only been a few years that the cloud has been taken seriously and from the beginning there have been grumblings about the security risks and loss of control. Some cloud providers have addressed many of those concerns and organizations are subscribing to services or building their own cloud infrastructure. It is where IT is going. But still,as with any new technology bursting with light, color and noise, take good care where and when you light the fuse. ps Related Cloud computing triples probability of major data breach: survey Cloud Could Triple Odds of $20M Data Breach Cloud Triples A Firm’s Probability of Data Breach The future of cloud is hybrid ... and seamless CloudExpo 2014: Future of the Cloud Surfing the Surveys: Cloud, Security and those Pesky Breaches Cloud Bursting Reference Architecture Technorati Tags: f5,cloud,security,risk,silva,survey,breach,fireworks,july 4 Connect with Peter: Connect with F5:
CVE-2013-3587 in Version 14.1.
Hello, A Security Audit asked for CVE-2013-3587. I came over this Info: https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K14634 but this is until Version 13, we're running Version 14.1 Does anyone know, how to mitigate this? Or does anyone know, how to handle http compression? There are some (for me) confusing docs on F5Surfing the Surveys: Cloud, Security and those Pesky Breaches
While I’m not the biggest fan of taking surveys, I sure love the data/reports that are generated by such creatures. And boy has there been a bunch of recent statistical information released on cloud computing, information security, breaches and general IT. Since this prologue is kinda lame, let’s just get into the sometimes frightening, sometimes encouraging and always interesting results from a variety of sources. 2012 Verizon Data Breach Report: If you haven’t, read Securosis' blog about how to read and digest the report. It’s a great primer on what to expect. An important piece mentioned is that it’s a Breach report, not a cybercrime or attack report. It only includes incidents where data was taken – no data loss, not included. And with that in mind, according to the report, there were 855 incidents with 174 million compromised records, the 2nd highest data loss total since they’ve been tracking (2004). This coming after a record low 4 million lost records last year. The gold record of stolen records. While hacktivism exploded, accounted for 100 million of that 174 mill of stolen records and 58% of all data theft along with untraditional motives; credit cards, intellectual property, classified info and trade secrets were all still hot targets. 81% of the breaches used some sort of hacking with 69% involving malware. 79% were targets of opportunity meaning they had an exploitable vulnerability rather than being ‘on a list.’ 96% of the breaches were not that difficult and 97% could have been avoided using simple to standard protection mechanisms. Unfortunately, organizations typically don’t discover the breach until weeks later. As Securosis points out, don’t be flustered by the massive increase in lost data but focus on the attack and defense trends to help protect against becoming a statistic and as Verizon mentions, ‘this study reminds us that our profession has the necessary tools to get the job done. The challenge for the good guys lies in selecting the right tools for the job at hand and then not letting them get dull and rusty over time. Evidence shows when that happens, the bad guys are quick to take advantage of it.’ BMC Software Survey: Conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of BMC, ‘Delivering on High Cloud Expectations’ found that while 81% of the respondents said that a comprehensive cloud strategy is a high priority, they are facing huge challenges in accomplishing that task – mainly complexity. Even with cost reduction as a top IT priority, 43% reported using three or more hypervisor technologies as they try to reduce complexity. CIOs are concerned that cloud technologies offer an avenue for groups to circumvent IT which may hinder IT’s ability to meet overall business expectations. When groups deploy unmanaged public cloud services without IT involvement it can add to the complexity that they are trying to avoid. While 79% of respondents do plan on supporting mission-critical workloads on unmanaged public cloud services over the next two years, only 36% allow this today. No surprise that hybrid-cloud deployments, at 37%, was the most desired deployment. The full study results will be announced on Thursday, April 26, 2012 at 11 a.m. CDT as part of a BMC webinar. CSC Cloud Usage Index: Late last year, Independent research firm TNS surveyed more than 3,500 cloud computing users in eight countries around the world to find answers to cloud usage, expectations, attitudes and other cloud related questions. The survey focused on capturing user information about outcomes and experiences rather than predictions and intentions. In an interesting shift from the typical ‘cost savings’ and ‘business agility’ usually cited as a top motivator, one-third of respondents cite their need to better connect employees who use a multitude of computing devices as the number one reason they adopt cloud. 17% claim agility and only 10% indicate cost savings as a top reason for cloud adoption. 82% of respondents said they saved money on their most recent cloud project but 35% of U.S organizations reported a payback of less that $20,000. In terms of overall IT performance, 93% of respondents say cloud improved their data center efficiency/utilization and 80% see similar improvements within six months of moving to the cloud. Zenoss 100 Best Cloud Stats of 2011: Admittedly, this came out last year but it is still a great statistical overview of Cloud Computing. It starts with data growth stats, like 48 hours of video uploaded to youtube every minute; that 74% of Data Centers have increased their server count over the last three years accounting for 5.75 million new servers every year yet 15% do not have data backup and recovery plans; that, on average, cloud users report saving 21% annually on those applications moved to the cloud; that a delay of 1 second in page load times equals 7% loss of conversions, 11% fewer pages viewed and a 16% decrease in customer satisfaction; that Agility is the top driver for cloud adoption and Scalability the top factor influencing cloud use; that 74% of companies are using some sort of cloud service today yet 79% do not have an IT roadmap for cloud computing and a whole slew of others. All the stats appear to be attributed and run the gamut from storage to cloud to apps. Cloud Industry Forum (CIF) study: As enterprises continue to embrace cloud adoption, it is important for service providers to understand motivators for cloud adoption to ensure those services are being offered. This study, USA Cloud Adoption & Trends 2012 shows that smaller U.S. companies indicate that flexibility as their main driver for cloud adoption while large enterprises cite cost savings as their main reason for cloud deployments. This survey also noted that ‘Cloud’ is no longer a nebulous buzzword with 76% of polled organizations already using some sort of cloud computing for at least one service. Organizations are happy about it also – 98% said they were satisfied with the results of their cloud services with 94% expecting to increase their use in the next 12 months. Data security and data privacy were tagged as the top concerns with 56% and 53% respectively. By no means an exhaustive list of all the recent survey results pertaining to cloud and/or IT security, but they do offer some interesting data points to consider as organizations continue to strive to deliver their available applications as fast and secure as possible. psEvery Day is a 0-Day Nowadays
It sure seems like 0-Days are now an every day occurrence. Headlines containing, 'breach,' 'attack,' 'hack,' 'vulnerability,' 'passwords,' 'compromised,' and 'you' are commonplace in the media these days. Typically a 0-day is described as a threat or an attack on a (previously) unknown vulnerability - this is day zero of enlightenment. Often, the developer themselves are not even aware of the vulnerability. 0-days can command multiple zeros after the dollar sign since malicious folks can exploit it immediately. From plug-ins to extensions to browsers to web apps to SCADA systems, 0-days used to be an every-so-often occurrence yet now, it's almost a once a day adventure. I propose that we re-define '0-day' to mean when zero vulnerabilities found and exploited or no breaches occur that day. 0-days would instantly become a rare happening. I should have titled this blog, Eliminate 0-Day Attacks! ...with a Simple Definition Adjustment. Now that would be a headline. March Madness, the NCAA Men's Division 1 Basketball Championship, is also a ripe time for attacks. As the tournament heats up so do phishing attacks, 0day exploits and malware madness. From fake wagering sites to score tickers to simple bracket apps, internet scams are all over. Be on high alert for web sites and emails asking you to enter your predictions, download brackets or any activity that involves clicking a suspicious link and entering info. Be especially wary of those that ask for your social media credentials to 'share' your predictions. While 0-days can ruin any day, be especially cautious during these times of the year when internet traffic surges and websites are fighting for your attention - the holidays are another example. The web app might be the target but you may become the victim. F5 certainly has solutions that can help organizations protect their critical infrastructures, systems, web apps and visitors. And with the agility of iRules, organizations can defend against 0-days in a matter of minutes. Stay secure and smile all the way through the madness. ps Related: What 420,000 insecure devices reveal about Web security March Madness Means More Malware Data breaches in higher education eEye Zero-Day Tracker New Java 0-Day Attack Echoes Bit9 Breach SCMag Threat of the month: Java zero-day Digital universe riddled with holes APT Dot Gov: Protecting Federal Systems from Advanced Threats | SANS White Paper F5 Application Delivery Firewall F5 Friday: Zero-Day Apache Exploit? Zero-Problem Technorati Tags: 0day,malware,march madness,phishing,silva,security,f5,ncaa,breach Connect with Peter: Connect with F5:
