Better together - F5 Container Ingress Services and NGINX Plus Ingress Controller Integration
Introduction
The F5 Container Ingress Services (CIS) can be integrated with the NGINX Plus Ingress Controllers (NIC) within a Kubernetes (k8s) environment.
The benefits are getting the best of both worlds, with the BIG-IP providing comprehensive L4 ~ L7 security services, while leveraging NGINX Plus as the de facto standard for micro services solution.
This architecture is depicted below.
The integration is made fluid via the CIS, a k8s pod that listens to events in the cluster and dynamically populates the BIG-IP pool pointing to the NIC's as they scale.
There are a few components need to be stitched together to support this integration, each of which is discussed in detail over the proceeding sections.
NGINX Plus Ingress Controller
Follow this (https://docs.nginx.com/nginx-ingress-controller/installation/building-ingress-controller-image/) to build the NIC image.
The NIC can be deployed using the Manifests either as a Daemon-Set or a Service. See this ( https://docs.nginx.com/nginx-ingress-controller/installation/installation-with-manifests/ ).
A sample Deployment file deploying NIC as a Service is shown below,
apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: nginx-ingress namespace: nginx-ingress spec: replicas: 3 selector: matchLabels: app: nginx-ingress template: metadata: labels: app: nginx-ingress #annotations: #prometheus.io/scrape: "true" #prometheus.io/port: "9113" spec: serviceAccountName: nginx-ingress imagePullSecrets: - name: abgmbh.azurecr.io containers: - image: abgmbh.azurecr.io/nginx-plus-ingress:edge name: nginx-plus-ingress ports: - name: http containerPort: 80 - name: https containerPort: 443 #- name: prometheus #containerPort: 9113 securityContext: allowPrivilegeEscalation: true runAsUser: 101 #nginx capabilities: drop: - ALL add: - NET_BIND_SERVICE env: - name: POD_NAMESPACE valueFrom: fieldRef: fieldPath: metadata.namespace - name: POD_NAME valueFrom: fieldRef: fieldPath: metadata.name args: - -nginx-plus - -nginx-configmaps=$(POD_NAMESPACE)/nginx-config - -default-server-tls-secret=$(POD_NAMESPACE)/default-server-secret - -ingress-class=sock-shop #- -v=3 # Enables extensive logging. Useful for troubleshooting. #- -report-ingress-status #- -external-service=nginx-ingress #- -enable-leader-election #- -enable-prometheus-metrics
Notice the ‘- -ingress-class=sock-shop’ argument, it means that the NIC will only work with an Ingress that is annotated with ‘sock-shop’. The absence of this annotation makes NIC the default for all Ingress created.
Below shows the counterpart Ingress with the ‘sock-shop’ annotation.
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1 kind: Ingress metadata: name: sock-shop-ingress annotations: kubernetes.io/ingress.class: "sock-shop" spec: tls: - hosts: - socks.ab.gmbh secretName: wildcard.ab.gmbh rules: - host: socks.ab.gmbh http: paths: - path: / backend: serviceName: front-end servicePort: 80
This Ingress says if hostname is socks.ab.gmbh and path is ‘/’, send traffic to a service named ‘front-end’, which is part of the socks application itself.
The above concludes Ingress configuration with the NIC.
F5 Container Ingress Services
The next step is to leverage the CIS to dynamically populate the BIG-IP pool with the NIC addresses.
Follow this ( https://clouddocs.f5.com/containers/v2/kubernetes/kctlr-app-install.html ) to deploy the CIS.
A sample Deployment file is shown below,
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: k8s-bigip-ctlr-deployment namespace: kube-system spec: # DO NOT INCREASE REPLICA COUNT replicas: 1 template: metadata: name: k8s-bigip-ctlr labels: app: k8s-bigip-ctlr spec: # Name of the Service Account bound to a Cluster Role with the required # permissions serviceAccountName: bigip-ctlr containers: - name: k8s-bigip-ctlr image: "f5networks/k8s-bigip-ctlr" env: - name: BIGIP_USERNAME valueFrom: secretKeyRef: # Replace with the name of the Secret containing your login # credentials name: bigip-login key: username - name: BIGIP_PASSWORD valueFrom: secretKeyRef: # Replace with the name of the Secret containing your login # credentials name: bigip-login key: password command: ["/app/bin/k8s-bigip-ctlr"] args: [ # See the k8s-bigip-ctlr documentation for information about # all config options # https://clouddocs.f5.com/products/connectors/k8s-bigip-ctlr/latest "--bigip-username=$(BIGIP_USERNAME)", "--bigip-password=$(BIGIP_PASSWORD)", "--bigip-url=https://x.x.x.x:8443", "--bigip-partition=k8s", "--pool-member-type=cluster", "--agent=as3", "--manage-ingress=false", "--insecure=true", "--as3-validation=true", "--node-poll-interval=30", "--verify-interval=30", "--log-level=INFO" ] imagePullSecrets: # Secret that gives access to a private docker registry - name: f5-docker-images # Secret containing the BIG-IP system login credentials - name: bigip-login
Notice the following arguments below. They tell the CIS to consume AS3 declaration to configure the BIG-IP. According to PM, CCCL (Common Controller Core Library) – used to orchestrate F5 BIG-IP, is getting removed this sprint for the CIS 2.0 release.
'--manage-ingress=false' means CIS is not doing anything for Ingress resources defined within the k8s, this is because that CIS is not the Ingress Controller, NGINX Plus is, as far as k8s is concerned.
The CIS will create a partition named k8s_AS3 on the BIG-IP, this is used to hold L4~7 configuration relating to the AS3 declaration.
The best practice is also to manually create a partition named 'k8s' (in our example), where networking info will be stored (e.g., ARP, FDB).
"--bigip-url=https://x.x.x.x:8443", "--bigip-partition=k8s", "--pool-member-type=cluster", "--agent=as3", "--manage-ingress=false", "--insecure=true", "--as3-validation=true",
To apply AS3, the declaration is embedded within a ConfigMap applied to the CIS pod.
kind: ConfigMap apiVersion: v1 metadata: name: as3-template namespace: kube-system labels: f5type: virtual-server as3: "true" data: template: | { "class": "AS3", "action": "deploy", "persist": true, "declaration": { "class": "ADC", "id":"1847a369-5a25-4d1b-8cad-5740988d4423", "schemaVersion": "3.16.0", "Nginx_IC": { "class": "Tenant", "Nginx_IC_vs": { "class": "Application", "template": "https", "serviceMain": { "class": "Service_HTTPS", "virtualAddresses": [ "10.1.0.14" ], "virtualPort": 443, "redirect80": false, "serverTLS": { "bigip": "/Common/clientssl" }, "clientTLS": { "bigip": "/Common/serverssl" }, "pool": "Nginx_IC_pool" }, "Nginx_IC_pool": { "class": "Pool", "monitors": [ "https" ], "members": [ { "servicePort": 443, "shareNodes": true, "serverAddresses": [] } ] } } } } }
They are telling the BIG-IP to create a tenant called ‘Nginx_IC’, a virtual named ‘Nginx_IC_vs’ and a pool named ‘Nginx_IC_pool’. The CIS will update the serverAddresses with the NIC addresses dynamically.
Now, create a Service to expose the NIC’s.
apiVersion: v1 kind: Service metadata: name: nginx-ingress namespace: nginx-ingress labels: cis.f5.com/as3-tenant: Nginx_IC cis.f5.com/as3-app: Nginx_IC_vs cis.f5.com/as3-pool: Nginx_IC_pool spec: type: ClusterIP ports: - port: 443 targetPort: 443 protocol: TCP name: https selector: app: nginx-ingress
Notice the labels, they match with the AS3 declaration and this allows the CIS to populate the NIC’s addresses to the correct pool. Also notice the kind of the manifest ‘Service’, this means only a Service is created, not an Ingress, as far as k8s is concerned.
On the BIG-IP, the following should be created.
The end product is below.
Please note that this article is focused solely on control plane, that is, how to get the CIS to populate the BIG-IP with NIC's addresses.
The specific mechanisms to deliver packets from the BIG-IP to the NIC's on the data plane is not discussed, as it is decoupled from control plane. For data plane specifics, please take a look here ( https://clouddocs.f5.com/containers/v2/ ).
Hope this article helps to lift the veil on some integration mysteries.
- Chris_ZhangRet. Employee
Hey Kunal,
I just did a test with the latest CIS (e.g., 2.0) by changing the deployment file with the following, and everything seems to be working.
image: "f5networks/k8s-bigip-ctlr:latest"
Please take a look at this folder in my repository ( https://gitlab.com/abgmbh/kitchen_sink/-/tree/master/k8s%20and%20Nginx/Kubernetes_IC/F5_Container_Ingress_service ).
On a side note, can you please use code quote for code or logs in future replies? It might be much easier to read as the logs are quite long.
Thanks,
Chris
- Ali_MNimbostratus
Hey ,
Thanks for the article, it's helpful. I'm trying to run through this setup and unfortunately I'm running into problems. I want to preface this by saying I am using the open-source version of NGINX. I know that this tutorial is based off of nginx-plus but I don't see anything obvious why this wouldn't work with the open source version. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
So I am able to get to the point where the big-ip controller on my Kubernetes cluster creates a virtual server, node pool and my nodes. The nodes created on the F5 are created using the NGINX pod's Cluster IP's. The nodes are shown as "down" -- as expected, as I see in your screenshot they're also down and the F5 doesn't know how to ping the pods.
When trying to hit my website via web browser, I get "ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT".
Here are the configuration args I am setting on my big-ip-controller:
- --credentials-directory=/var/run/secrets/credentials - --bigip-url=xxxxx - --pool-member-type=cluster - --bigip-partition=$(BIGIP_PARTITION) - --insecure=true - --manage-ingress=false - --as3-validation=true - --manage-configmaps=true - --log-as3-response=true
My ConfigMap for the AS3 declaration is the same as yours except that I changed the client certificate. I have tried the original ConfigMap as well, no luck there.
Here is what my NGINX Service looks like:
apiVersion: v1 kind: Service metadata: name: ali-service namespace: xxx labels: cis.f5.com/as3-tenant: Nginx_IC cis.f5.com/as3-app: Nginx_IC_vs cis.f5.com/as3-pool: Nginx_IC_pool spec: type: ClusterIP ports: - port: 443 targetPort: 443 protocol: TCP name: https selector: app: nginx-ingress component: controller release: nginx-ingress
And finally, I did try making my service a `NodePort` (instead of ClusterIP) to make sure that I can reach my service via NGINX. This works. I've reverted the change back to ClusterIP.
I'm not exactly sure what I'm doing wrong and I would appreciate some guidance on what to check.
My company does have a F5 support plan so if you think a ticket would be better, I can get one going. Alternatively, if you have a moment to respond here or on a phone call that would work for me as well.
Thanks Chris!
Edit: One thing I want to point out is my nodes on the F5 are created in the "Common" partition, not in the "NGINX_IC" partition. It's hard to tell whether it should be created in the NGINX_IC partition. Either way, the Node Pool is referencing the nodes. But I don't know if this is contributing to my problem.
Edit 2: I think I understand where I'm going wrong, now that I think of it. My cluster CNI is flannel and I'm using host-gw. When running the big-ip controller in "cluster" mode, you're essentially integrating the F5 within the overlay network, which means I need to be running VXLAN. Can I confirm with you, Chris, that host-gw won't work? I think this is an obvious no because then the big-ip controller adds your actual Kubernetes VM nodes to the F5 node pool, not the pods of the nginx controller. I've tried setting the controller mode to "nodeport" which also doesn't seem to work. Thanks!
- Chris_ZhangRet. Employee
Hey Ali,
When you say host-gw, are you referring to adding static routes on the F5 with the pod IP space pointing to the Kubernetes nodes as gateways? It is routing similar to what BGP does but I have not tested it myself. Are you able to reach the Pods from within the F5? You might also need to add routes on the Kubernetes nodes for returning traffic.
From a routing's perspective it sounds like a feasible solution. But I don't know if there are intricacies that Calico as a CNI does with regards to routing that we don't know about.
Regarding NGINX_IC partition, my understanding is that it's all done by AS3 via ConfigMap. Partition is only an administrative function, creating nodes in Common should not affect data traffic.
Thanks,
Chris
- Ali_MNimbostratus
Hey @Chris, thanks for the response!
host-gw is a mode in flannel. You're right -- I believe it uses the machine's routing table to move traffic in and out of the overlay network. Unfortunately I cannot reach pods from within the F5, that is a limitation and only supported in Flannel VXLAN it seems (unless I do static routes as you mentioned but these seems very complicated).
Thanks for clarifying the partition question. Do you know how we can specify in the AS3 declaration so that the nodes get created in the correct partition? I'd like to do it for organizational purposes.
Thanks again!
- Chris_ZhangRet. Employee
Use Common and Shared, see below. The objects will be create in /Common/Shared location.
"Common": { "class": "Tenant", "enable": true, "Shared": { "class": "Application", "template": "shared", ...
https://gitlab.com/abgmbh/kitchen_sink/-/blob/master/AS3/Common.json#L10
- Ali_MNimbostratus
Thanks . Three other questions for you:
- How can I do SSL offloading? One article I found online suggested I set my ServiceMain `class` to `Service_TCP`. That didn't seem to work.
- My NGINX-Ingress has `externalTrafficPolicy: "Local"` set so that the source IP is reserved but I still don't see it working. How do I get the F5 to set `x-forwarded-for`?
- Third question is do you have a handy reference guide where I can find out what other things I can do using AS3? It seems like the AS3 reference guide doesn't closely follow what we are doing here. In other words, it looks like AS3 for Kubernetes setup is a bit different than your regular AS3 declarations. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks!
Edit: Figured out how to get SSL passthrough working manually. Had to change my VS to Performance (L4). Time to figure out how to do it via AS3 🙂
- Chris_ZhangRet. Employee
SSL offload would need a SSL cert on the F5. - https://gitlab.com/abgmbh/kitchen_sink/-/blob/master/k8s%20and%20Nginx/Kubernetes_IC/F5_Container_Ingress_service/CIS_fronting_NIC/f5-k8s-bigip-ctlr-ConfigMap_with_cert.yaml
SSL passthrough is a straight up L4 VIP. - https://clouddocs.f5.com/products/extensions/f5-appsvcs-extension/latest/declarations/non-http-services.html#tcp-load-balanced-to-icap-with-custom-monitor (without the ICAP)
With XFF, you can either use a HTTP profile ( https://clouddocs.f5.com/products/extensions/f5-appsvcs-extension/latest/refguide/schema-reference.html#http-profile-insertheader ) to insert the header or use an irule and have AS3 to attach that irule.
For use cases, please take a look at this ( https://clouddocs.f5.com/products/extensions/f5-appsvcs-extension/latest/declarations/ ).
The AS3 should be the same for the Kubernetes setup as well, the BIG-IP gets to process it regardless where the declaration comes from.
To assist with writing AS3 declaration, you might want to use Visual Studio Code and take advantage of syntax checking feature. ( https://clouddocs.f5.com/products/extensions/f5-appsvcs-extension/latest/userguide/validate.html )
- kunalpuriiiAltocumulus
Thanks for all your help sofar.
I have question regarding AS3 extension, currently we have test this integration by installing AS3 extension under iApps > Package Management LX. in F5( Is this a pre-requisite or a definite requirement)
We have 10+ opco's and vCMP is deployed for all of the, do I need to install AS3 extension in all the vCMP's to have AS3 support, Is there any centralized designed may be using BIG IQ? or any other centralized server?
Thanks
Kunal Puri
- Eric_ChenEmployee
AS3 does need to be installed on each device. The BIG-IP Controller for Kubernetes talks directly to the BIG-IP device.
- kunalpuriiiAltocumulus
thanks for your response, I actually tested it in the past and have tested it again. If we dont have f5-appsvcs installed in F5, F5 does not get AS3 update. Thus new pool member are not updated.