Forum Discussion
Nimbostratusvirtual server behavior
Dears,
I would like to double check the following behavior related to the following two virtual servers where destination host in VS2 is included into VS1 subnet :
Virtual server 1 (type IP forwarding)
source : 0.0.0.0/0 destination : 192.168.1.0/24 port : 3389
Virtual server 2 (type IP forwarding) --> created for troubleshooting purpose source : 0.0.0.0/0 destination : 192.168.1.1/32 ports : all TCP all UDP
If I disable virtual server 2 I was not able to access 192.168.1.1/32 on port 3389 via virtual server 1. After sever trials and by chance the problem was solved by completely deleting VS2.
thanks in advance.
Best Regards, Ralph El Habr
natheCirrocumulus
Ralph, this is by design. See Disabling a virtual server may not prevent a lower precedence virtual server from processing traffic
default settings do not allow a lower precedence virtual server to handle a request when a higher precedence virtual server is administratively disabled. This behavior is by design, and is controlled by the tm.continuematching db variableAnd this one too: Overview of the 'tm.continuematching' db variable
Hope this helps,
N