Forum Discussion
Sumanta_88744
Jun 11, 2016Cirrus
Universal Persistence with X-forwarder
Hi Experts Can I use Universal persistence using x-forwarder with i-rule? I would have each x-forwarded IP stick to the same back-end pool member. Will this work? Can you please share code? Any ...
- Jul 20, 2016
A formatted version of the "Per VS" rate limiting. You can apply the same irule to all standard VS using UIE persistence.
when RULE_INIT { set static::maxReqs 3; set static::timeout 60; } when HTTP_REQUEST { set vs [URI::basename [virtual]] if { [HTTP::header exists "X-Forwarded-For"] } { set client_IP_addr [getfield [lindex [HTTP::header values "X-Forwarded-For"] 0] "," 1] } else { set client_IP_addr [IP::client_addr] } if { ([HTTP::method] eq "GET") and ([class match [string tolower [HTTP::uri]] ends_with $vs_URI_LIST_TO_LIMIT] ) } { whitelist if { [class match [IP::client_addr] equals $vs_ips_whitelist] }{ return } set getcount [table lookup -notouch "$vs_$client_IP_addr:[HTTP::uri]"] if { $getcount equals "" } { table set "$vs_$client_IP_addr:[HTTP::uri]" "1" $static::timeout $static::timeout } else { if { $getcount < $static::maxReqs } { table incr -notouch "$vs_$client_IP_addr:[HTTP::uri]" } else { reject } } } persist uie $clientip } when HTTP_RESPONSE { persist add uie $clientip }
Sumanta_88744
Cirrus
Hi Yann
One more query is how to rate limit the connections per XFF IP address? Do we need to modify the rule or write something new?
Regards,
Sumanta.
Sumanta_88744
Jul 20, 2016Cirrus
Actually I was wondering whether or not modifying the existing persistence iRule is needed or not? Maybe it is easier to just add a new single iRule and apply it to both virtual servers as needed.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects