Forum Discussion
Using shared object with BigIP
Hi,
Just a "stupid" question:
Is there a reason NOT to use Shared object address list's with a VS?
In contrast using multiple VS configurations (when only destination address is the difference).
Like to hear you thoughts
Please lookup your /config/bigip_base.conf for the ACL related configuration objects.
The shared objects concept may significantly reduce the number of configuration objects, i.e. mixing IPv4/IPv6 source/destination addresse in lists. Same story for destination ports.
7 Replies
When using shared objects some ACL mechanisms are applied in the background.
In the past I saw some issues there (especially in the context of route domains), which seem to be fixed in the current TMOS v15.1.5.1.
Hi Stephan,
Thanks for the response. This is the same version we are running at the moment ๐Please lookup your /config/bigip_base.conf for the ACL related configuration objects.
The shared objects concept may significantly reduce the number of configuration objects, i.e. mixing IPv4/IPv6 source/destination addresse in lists. Same story for destination ports.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com