Forum Discussion
southern_shredd
Cirrus
Cirrusredirect to to 301 location
We are trying to come up with an irule that will: redirect based on id value X (eg. 144 string) to a new URL and append the same value in this new URL . So it must extract the id=X value and append ...
My bad, there's a typo.
Edited in previous comment
southern_shreddCirrus
CirrusThanks for the response, could we make it such that anything after /datastorage/XXXX be extracted and appended to the new URL? So it does not have to be numeric values only (144,145 etc.
Example
/#/?id=144
https://different-website.domain/external/services/datastorage/#/?id=144
https://different-website.domain/external/services/datastorage/#/50b2580d-9f9f-41b7-b0af-618d570de14f/receipt
https://different-website.domain/external/services/datastorage/#/?vi=BYR&saksnr=12221&id=144
redirected to:
https://different-website.domain/external/services/datastorage/#/?id=144
https://different-website.domain/external/services/datastorage/#/50b2580d-9f9f-41b7-b0af-618d570de14f/receipt
https://different-website.domain/external/services/datastorage/#/?vi=BYR&saksnr=12221&id=144
So perhaps using "HTTP::query" & /path maybe
when HTTP_REQUEST {
if { [HTTP::uri] starts_with "/external/services/datastorage"
CA_ValliMVP
It didn't have to be numeric, script captured everything that followed "id=" so "id=abCD456" could be a match as well. I used numeric in my test because I assumed it was.
Code for scripting a wildcard match is much simpler, but once again I'm concerned that all of your URLs have a fragment identifier, which (being a client-only feature) I believe is not being sent by browser -- therefore parser will not see that part with [HTTP::uri] or [HTTP::query].
when HTTP_REQUEST { if { [HTTP::uri] starts_with "/external/services/datastorage/" }{ HTTP::respond 301 Location "https://different-website.domain[HTTP::uri]" } }- southern_shredd
I got an error when trying to compile the irule
error: [command is not valid in the current scope][}]- CA_Valli
My bad, there's a typo.
Edited in previous comment