Load balancing terminal servers w/o Session Directory

Great! But does that mean you increased or decreased the timeout? I would think you increased it so it would "remember" your session longer. Will the timeout be long enough or will you have users that want to reconnect to a session the next morning? Just out of curiosity, why not use Session Directory? Was the session directory a device you didn't want to manage? was it a cost issue?

 

 

Probably the last thing you want to do is answer a bunch of questions after you issue if resolved ;-), I'm just trying to determine if my perception of how often Session Dir is used compared to not is accurate.