Forum Discussion
suthomas1
Cirrostratus
Mar 06, 2019Health monitors
Hello,
We have a http service with its pool.
a) Is it better to have both http & tcp monitor on it or just one of them & why?
b) What is the interval of this monitor running against the pool/no...
jaikumar_f5
Noctilucent
Mar 07, 2019You should know that http Get happens after a successful 3 way handshake. So why would one simply add tcp monitor again, which is again a 3way handshake...
Well it depends on how you are assigning both the monitors to the pool. If you use
http or tcp together, it could be because you are sure that tcp would work always and not sure of the content check monitor, whether the server team has built the path or not, often these happens during the migration works. You just don't want the pool to go down because the service is Up, but not the content check path, so you put tcp monitor, but along with that you also add http/https monitor to know if it really passes content check. In long run, you would be removing tcp and keeping http alone.
But if you do
http and tcp it's really of no use.Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
DevCentral Quicklinks
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com
Discover DevCentral Connects