Forum Discussion

boczon_108037's avatar
boczon_108037
Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
Oct 27, 2010

Cacti LTM 10.2 n opool data returned

Anyone experience any issues with Cacti not logging pool data correctly for LTM 10.2?

 

 

Here is the error.

 

+ Running data query [14]. + Found type = '3' [snmp query].

 

+ Found data query XML file at 'E:/cacti/resource/snmp_queries/f5_bigip_pool.xml'

 

+ XML file parsed ok. + Executing SNMP walk for list of indexes @ '.1.3.6.1.4.1.3375.2.2.5.2.3.1.1'

 

+ No SNMP data returned

 

+ Found data query XML file at 'E:/cacti/resource/snmp_queries/f5_bigip_pool.xml'

 

+ Found data query XML file at 'E:/cacti/resource/snmp_queries/f5_bigip_pool.xml'

 

+ Found data query XML file at 'E:/cacti/resource/snmp_queries/f5_bigip_pool.xml'

 

 

manual snmp walk is working

 

 

snmpwalk -v 2c -c mycummunity myf5host .1.3.6.1.4.1.3375.2.2.5.2.3.1.1

 

 

Running that brings back data a full list of all pools

 

 

Same Cacti installation is working for other hosts.

 

 

A wireshark trace shows the snmpbulkwalk stops on the 20th pool. I can recreate the same issue on two different LTMs (not an HA pair)

 

 

Communication is through a FW but can verify FW rule is OK

 

 

LTMs that are not working are 10.2HF1 6900's I can collect and graph interface stats but can not do the same for pools or VS.

 

 

 

management
monitoring
  • JRahm's avatar
    JRahm
    Icon for Admin rankAdmin
    Oct 28, 2010
    I have not tried this, but if you have repeatable results just from a snmpwalk, then I'd get a case open. If found to be a bug, can you post the CR back here?
  • Wilfried_113615's avatar
    Wilfried_113615
    Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
    May 26, 2011
    Hi,

    having the same problem with LTM 8900, v10.2 for the pool connection snmp queries. the snmpwalk f5_bigip_pool.xml for the working 6400 show many values. the snmpwalk f5_bigip_pool.xml for the not working 8900 shows: No Such Object available on this agent at this OID. So I think there must be a difference in the OIDs between both machine types.

     

    So I've done 2 snmpwalk on different LTM machine types but same v10.2, first the working LTM 6400:

     

     

    [a2590172@cdcacp01 ~]$ snmpwalk -v2c -c public loadbal6400 .1.3.6.1.4.1.3375.2.2.5.2.3.1.1

     

    SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3375.2.2.5.2.3.1.1.7.99.111.98.105.100.101.118 = STRING: "cobidev"

     

    SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3375.2.2.5.2.3.1.1.7.99.111.98.105.105.110.116 = STRING: "cobiint"

     

    SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3375.2.2.5.2.3.1.1.8.99.111.98.105.100.101.118.97 = STRING: "cobideva"

     

    SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3375.2.2.5.2.3.1.1.8.99.111.98.105.100.101.118.98 = STRING: "cobidevb"

     

    SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3375.2.2.5.2.3.1.1.8.99.111.98.105.100.101.118.99 = STRING: "cobidevc"

     

    SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3375.2.2.5.2.3.1.1.8.99.111.98.105.100.101.118.100 = STRING: "cobidevd"

     

    SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3375.2.2.5.2.3.1.1.8.99.111.98.105.116.101.115.116 = STRING: "cobitest"

     

    SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3375.2.2.5.2.3.1.1.8.109.111.98.105.108.100.101.118 = STRING: "mobildev"

     

    :

     

    :

     

    and now the LTM 8900:

     

    [a2590172@cdcacp01 ~]$ snmpwalk -v2c -c public loadbal8900 .1.3.6.1.4.1.3375.2.2.5.2.3.1.1

     

    SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.3375.2.2.5.2.3.1.1 = No Such Object available on this agent at this OID

     

     

    This means that there must be a difference between the pool MIB's. I would like to know if I have to find a workaround for this and build new cacti definitions, or I can wait for a patch.

     

     

     

     

  • Wilfried_113615's avatar
    Wilfried_113615
    Icon for Nimbostratus rankNimbostratus
    Jun 14, 2011
    Have a case open: C899543

     

    Greets

     

    Wilfried

     

     

    ...and solution is to bigstart restart the application.