Forum Discussion
best method to loadbalance bigip vips with GTM
I am trying to understand, which is the best method to loadbalance bigip VIPs from two different datacenters:
1> create two datacenters in GTM group, add the bigip VIPs as nodes into it - OR 2> add the bigips to the GTM using 'bigipadd' and then add the vips under each corresponding bigip section in the GTM. Use these in the building loadbalancing wideips.
The catch with 1st option is that bigip vips complete tcp handshake even when they are down because of members being down behind them. This might lead to false state of VIPs in GTM pools. So, is using bigipadd (iquery is used to send status of VIPs to GTM) the only feasible and practical method of loadbalancing bigip VIPs with GTM?
4 Replies
- Cory_50405
Noctilucent
Option 2 is the ideal configuration. You'll always want to configure GTM -> LTM communication using iQuery and allow the LTM to report the health of its objects through that channel.
- jaked_150553
Nimbostratus
Can you point me to any article which details this setup please?
- Cory_50405
Noctilucent
Sure. Here's an article detailing the GTM -> LTM setup:
http://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_gtm/manuals/product/gtm-implementations-11-3-0/7.html
You'd build your GTM pool objects to reference the virtual servers defined underneath the LTM server objects. You don't need to explicitly define health monitors at the GTM level since they are inherited from LTM.
- jaked_150553
Nimbostratus
Thanks a lot Cory :)
Help guide the future of your DevCentral Community!
What tools do you use to collaborate? (1min - anonymous)Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com