Advice on "persist hash" load balancing

Thanks Deb, this seems to resolve the problem! However, is this a viable option to use in a production configuration, or does it have measurable impact against our previous benefit of connection marshalling? If I understand correctly the last thing you said, the total number of connections across all webserver nodes will now equal the total number of client connections to the Bigip device, where we're currently seeing only a small fraction of the total client connections appear on the webservers.

 

 

While this would probably be an acceptable tradeoff for the benefit we can get, I want to make sure that's an accurate picture of it, and that this isn't discouraged behavior.

 

 

Thanks!

 

 

Roger