Forum Discussion
Active/DR DNS Deploy | Best practice
Why don't you use BIND as an authoritative stealth name server, and then xfer the DNS zones into the F5 GTMs using DNS Express. The F5s will respond to the queries and hide the master. If you have both GTMs part of the same sync group, the. both Prod and DR will have the same records and be ready for use.
- escmanJun 07, 2023Cirrus
Hello whisperer,
Thanks for your reply, but transfer the zones to the F5 DNS is not at play right now so I have to use the same conditions that I already has at the active site..
- whispererJun 07, 2023MVP
Just to be clear, are you lord balancing DNS using LTM module, or using DNS module for GSLB and DNS screening or hosting? I will give some guidance for both scenarios:
- LTM: Just keep the respective VS or pool members disabled. Manually bring them up.
- GTM: Easiest way is upstream DNS records. Delegate to only Production GTM listener, and if you need to failover, the. modify this configuration to delegate to DR instead. Although, think you mention the DR F5 doesn't have the GTM/DNS module provisioned?
Finally, remember GTM uses a component of LTM under the hood. If you want to delegate to BOTH, but just receive responses from Production, then just manually down the LTM VIP used as the GTM/DNS listener. You can always enable it during DR recovery procedure.
- escmanJun 07, 2023Cirrus
My main question is about building the Primary DNS (which contains the authority for most zones and is not an F5) on the DR site. When the Primary DNS nameserver that will be positioned on the DR site is registered as a nameserver for zones not delegated to F5, it will receive queries that I would not like to happen because the prerequisite is not to send any traffic to the DR site while the active site is operational.
Recent Discussions
Related Content
* Getting Started on DevCentral
* Community Guidelines
* Community Terms of Use / EULA
* Community Ranking Explained
* Community Resources
* Contact the DevCentral Team
* Update MFA on account.f5.com