AAM: how to cache home page? (when path = /)
I'm trying to figure out how to cache pages if the request doesn't contain a file name (e.g. http://www.domain.com/)..) I assumed that the MIME-type of the Object Type (under Policies) would classify HTML-pages as such, but it looks like this doesn't cover requests without a matching file extension. What am I missing?
Web Accelerator not responding to iControl invalidation commands
We have an eCommerce site and need to be able to invalidate the cache programatically under certain conditions (e.g. a product goes out of stock and we don't want the product page to show a Buy Now button). We also invalidate the entire cache on a daily basis after our stock and price updates. We currently do this now with our old Piva v4 servers. We have been told that we could do this with v10 using iControl. We have tried several methods to do this, but the cache is not being invalidated. Things we have tried: 1. Using the provided Perl script 2. Using soapUI to send the message and look at the results. We get the response but the cache is not invalidated. 3. Using a Java class along with the iControl assembly iControl.jar (recompiled under JDK 1.4.2) In all cases, we are not seeing the cache invalidated. We have tried both the invalidate_content as well as the esi_invalidate_content methods. We've tried with putting START_INVALIDATION_MESSAGE:b2c in front of the xml as well as without it. I can send the exact same message to our v4 server (without the START_INVALIDATION_MESSAGE) and the cache invalidates. In all cases, we are Base64 encoding it as it shows in the Perl script: Message must be Base64 encoded inorder to send in SOAP message my $encoded_message = encodeBase64($message); We can get SystemInfo just fine using soapUI and Java (haven't tried it with Perl) so we know we are able to connect and get good responses back If I login to the admin console and invalidate the entire cache there, it works just fine as well. We need to get iControl working so we can put these servers into our production environment and retire our v4 servers.
Apache Virtual Hosts
I'm load balancing 2 apache servers, each have the same named base virtual hosts defined. If I go behind the BIGIP the virtual hosts work fine. When I try to access them through the BIGIP I get the following error: "Access Denied by intermediary. Domain not recognized." I'm not using ssl (at least not yet). Any ideas?
Different caching policies
Hi I have applied a policy on a caching VS , but now need to do a modification and I need to send two different policies depending on whether caching is a uri or another but all within the same VS example - Www.host.com/kkkk/ * - > send to politics 1 - Www.host.com/abcd/ * - > send to politics 2 Is this possible ? , As might be the irule ? Thanks for the responseHow does WA do ETags?
I've looked and looked but can't find any info on how Etags are "calculated" on the WA. I need to know to help diagnose some upstream caching issues. Most importantly, am interested in how Etags play in asymmetric configuration (4 standalone boxes in round-robin). Will ETags be consistant across the 4 machines?WA access logs
I am setting up a new deployment of some WA's and was surprised at the lack of any options to manage the access logs. In poking around, I see there's a cron that runs hourly to logrotate at 10MB size. My WA's will be in a pretty high-traffic environment and this seems too low. I'd be curious to hear what others are doing to manage large amounts of access logs. I'm estimating my logs to be about 600-700MB/day per box.
Can't access the sharepoint portal
hi All, I followed the steps to configure WA as below: 1. Creating an application profile for an asymmetric WebAccelerator system. In the policy, selected the sharepoint 2010 (we are using sharepoint portal 2010) 2. Enabling the WebAccelerator system with the Web Acceleration profile 3. Import the certificate and keys of the Servers 4. Create SSL profile for both Server and Client Site 5.Configure Node, Pool 6. Configure Virtual Server with the SSL Profile and WA Profile just created above From the browser, I put the ip of VS but can't access to the portal I tried to do another way by: 1. Import the certificate and keys of the Servers 2. Create SSL profile for both Server and Client Site 3.Configure Node, Pool 4. Configure Virtual Server with the SSL Profile just created above and at the WA profile I choose the default WebAcceleration From the browser, I put the ip of VS and I can access the portal normally but from the logs I saw there were a lot of misses in caches so I think the WA funtion doesn't work completely well. Please let know why it doesn't work at all if I create the WA profile by myself. Thanks, KietAccess Denied - Credentials Missing when browsing SharePoint 2010
I have recently deployed an http profile to enable web acceleration though when ever I attempt to access the page, I receive an error that credentials are missing. I have a standard profile using TCP Lan optimization default settings, default http profile, SharePoint 2010 WA policy and cookie persistence. Lastly, when using performance layer 4 Virtual Server, I am able to browse the SharePoint page as expected. Thoughts?logging X-Forwarded-For in WA hit logs
I already asked this question over a year ago [here] and never got any answer, so i'm asking again. I want to log the value of an X-Forwarded-For header in my WA access logs. There are plenty of examples on DC of how to do this on your origin server but none that talk about the WA hit logs. We have this mysterious "Custom Request Information" option available but I cannot find it documented anywere. Someone, please!
MutilConnect with sharepoint 2007
Dear all, I have issue about WA with multiconnect feature when I created application policy on central policy is MS Sharepint 2007 and enabled multiconnect with 2 subdomain. When I tried to access sharepoint, I got popup authentication looping all the times. if I disabled muticonnect every thing is ok. Can you suggest me what happening and can we use multiconnect with the webpage that use authentication or not? Thanks you