Detection of Malicious Users using F5 Distributed Cloud WAAP – Part III
Introduction We have already discussed the advantages that the F5 Distributed cloud’s solution for malicious users’ brings to the table as well as how simple it is to configure and monitor those events using an interactive UI dashboard of F5 Distributed Cloud Console. Below are the links for parts 1 and 2 of this article: Detection of Malicious Users using F5 Distributed Cloud WAAP – Part I Detection of Malicious Users using F5 Distributed Cloud WAAP – Part II In this article, we will go over a few more test scenarios covering the detection and mitigation of malicious user events. Demonstration (using Multi Load Balancer ML config) Scenario 1: In this scenario, we will monitor and mitigate detected malicious users for forbidden access attempts. Step1: Enable malicious user detection using Multi Load Balancer ML config as mentioned in the document. Step2: Configure a policy that prevents users from accessing a specific path. From the Console homepage, click Web App & API Protection. Click Manage -> Service Policies -> Service Policies. Click 'Add service policy,' give it a name, and set the rules as needed. Here, we are prohibiting access to the path '/delete,' as illustrated in the screenshot below. As a result, users will be unable to access the endpoint "https://<domain>/delete". Go to Home -> Web App & API Protection -> Manage -> Load Balancers -> HTTP Load Balancers, and add the created service policy to the LB Step3: Configure app setting object to detect malicious user activity based on forbidden access requests Go to Home->WAAP->Manage->AI&ML->App Settings, click ‘Add App Setting’. Enter a name and go to ‘AppType’ Settings section. Click ‘Add item’. Click on the ‘App Type’ drop-down and select the app type configured in the LB while executing Step1. Click ‘Configure’ in ‘Malicious User Detection’, tune the settings as per your need. Here, we have set the threshold limit for forbidden access requests to 10, beyond which the system will flag the user as malicious. Apply and add the configurations and then click ‘Save and Exit’ to create the app settings object. Step4: Configure automatic mitigation for malicious users Go to your LB and click ‘Edit Configuration’ Scroll down to ‘Common Security Controls’ section Enable 'Malicious User Mitigation And Challenges'. Set the ‘Malicious User Mitigation Settings’ as ‘Default’. click Save & Exit. Step5: Generate requests (more than the configured threshold value in Step3) to forbidden path (https://<domain>/delete). Note: Here generating requests indicates attempts of an attacker to bypass 403 forbidden error response. For example, trying different HTTP request methods, manipulating endpoint by appending sequences to it like {%2e}, {%2f}, {%5c} or by applying some other technique manually or through script. Step6: Go to Home->Web App & API Protection->Overview->Dashboards->Security Dashboard, select your LB and switch to Malicious Users tab, monitor the activity. Note: You can also use manual configuration for mitigation if automatic mitigation is not applied by simply clicking on ‘Block User’ on the top right side and adding detected malicious user's IP address to the deny list. Scenario 2: In this scenario, we will set the configuration to detect malicious users based on requests from potentially High-Risk IPs and block them by configuring default automatic mitigation action. Step1: Enable malicious user detection using Multi Load Balancer ML config as mentioned in the document. Step2: In app settings object configuration, make sure 'IP Reputation' is enabled (follow points in Step3 from Scenario1). Apply, Save & Exit. Step3: Follow Step4 in Scenario 1 to enable default automatic malicious user mitigation action . Step4: Generate 20+ requests in a minute from Tor browser. At the end follow Step6 from Scenario1 to monitor the malicious user activity Note: Tor is a free and open-source software developed to hide its user’s identity and activities over the Internet and make them anonymous. Conclusion This brings us to the end of this article series. We have seen how F5 Distributed Cloud WAAP’s security solution for malicious users aids in the identification and mitigation of suspicious activities. Alert fatigue, long investigation times, missed attacks, and false positives are all common issues for security teams. However, by utilizing malicious user detection, security teams can effectively filter out noise and identify actual risks and threats without the need for manual intervention. Suspicious actions such as Forbidden access attempts, login failures, and so on create a timeline of events that suggests the possibility of malicious user activity. Users who exhibit such behavior can be blocked manually or automatically based on their threat levels, and exceptions can be made using allow lists.Detection of Malicious Users using F5 Distributed Cloud WAAP – Part I
Introduction As people embraced the Internet as a part of their daily lives, businesses all over the world discovered an easier way to reach a large customer base that is not restricted by geographical boundaries. While that is important, it has also provided an open platform for malicious users to look for potential security loopholes in order to break into the system and cause severe damages. As a result, safeguarding business applications from such malicious user events becomes extremely critical. F5 Distributed Cloud WAAP (Web App & API Protection) offers a solution for monitoring such security events as well as the means to mitigate them. In this series of articles, we will demonstrate enabling, configuring, monitoring, and mitigating malicious users using F5 Distributed Cloud console. Configuration There are two ways to enable malicious user detection: Using Single Load Balancer ML configuration. Using Multi Load Balancer ML configuration. Using Single Load Balancer ML Configuration: In this mechanism, detection is enabled as part of the load balancer configuration and is only applicable to the load balancer on which it is configured. Using Multi Load Balancer ML Configuration: In this mechanism, detection is enabled as part of the app type configuration and is valid for all LBs configured with the same app type label. In both of the mentioned ways, detection is dependent on the ML configuration derived from the app settings object, with the difference that in single load balancer ML config values are not configurable and are set to default, whereas in multi load balancer ML config values can be configured according to the need. Once malicious user events have been identified, the next stage is to prioritize mitigation. The following are two ways of mitigating detected malicious user events: Using Load Balancer Security Monitoring. Using Load Balancer Advanced Security Configuration. Using Load Balancer Security Monitoring This is a manual way of configuring mitigation in which malicious user IPs are added to the allow/deny list. Using Load Balancer Advanced Security Configuration This is an automatic way of enabling mitigation in which the platform will apply the corresponding configured mitigation action for the specific threat levels. The default identifier configured for addressing malicious user events is the client IP address but in the ever-evolving world of attacks spoofing identity is not a difficult task to perform and to uniquely identify a user we should have a set of other identification mechanisms, keeping that in mind F5 Distributed Cloud console also provides you with the option to configure other parameters of identification like cookie name, header name, query parameter, ASN, TLS Fingerprint and combination of IP-header name & IP-TLS Fingerprint. Follow the documentation for step-by-step configuration instructions Demonstration (Using Single Load Balancer ML Configuration) In this demonstration we will enable malicious user detection, configure a WAF policy with enforcement mode as monitoring, configure malicious user mitigation actions for medium and high threat levels and at the end monitor the XC logs for malicious user activity. Step1: Enable malicious user detection using Single Load Balancer ML config as mentioned in the document. Step2: Create an App Firewall policy. Select WAAP service from the home page then go to Manage->App Firewall and click on 'Add App Firewall'. Add name and customize the fields as needed, Save & Exit. Step3: Configure mitigation actions. Go to WAAP->Manage->Shared Objects->Malicious User Mitigation and click on Add Malicious User Mitigation. Add a name, set threat level and associated actions accordingly. Add Item, Save & Exit. Step4: Attach the WAF policy and add the malicious user mitigation settings to the LB. From the Console homepage, Go to Load Balancers->Manage->Load Balancers->HTTP Load Balancers, select ‘Manage Configuration’ as an ‘Action’ to your LB and click ‘Edit Configuration’. Scroll down to Web Application Firewall (WAF), enable it and set the waf policy created in Step 2, Save & Exit. Scroll down to 'Common Security Controls' enable 'Malicious User Mitigation And Challenges', set 'Malicious User Mitigation Settings' as ‘custom’ and add the mitigation rule created in Step 3, Apply the changes. (Note: Here we have provided the flexibility to configure custom malicious user mitigation setting. However, users can also select default, which is a recommended setting). Step5: Generate XSS attack (20+ requests in a minute) e.g., https://<domain>?a=<script> Step6: Monitor the malicious user activity. Go to WAAP -> Overview -> Dashboards->Security Dashboard, scroll down and select your LB. Select Malicious Users tab. On top of the above dashboard, F5 XC console also provides a seperate malicious users dashboard which shows a global view of potential malicious users interacting with the application load balancers in a specific namespace giving a better visibility and greater context about the malicious traffic and ease the process of tracking and mitigating possible attacks with quick assessment. Below are a few screenshots of the same. To view this dashboard navigate to Home -> Web App & API Protection -> Overview -> Threat Insights -> Malicious Users As you can see from the demonstration, even though the waf policy is set to monitoring mode, in the background, malicious user activity is continued to be tracked and the threat level kept increasing with the number of attacks being performed, and once the threat level reached ‘High’, configured mitigation action got triggered. (Note: Based on malicious user mitigation settings different threat levels will have different mitigation actions, for example: in default settings for low threat level, JavaScript Challenge will be applied, for medium threat level, Captcha Challenge will be applied and for high threat level, users will be temporarily blocked). In this scenario, Customers can block attackers in real-time with very low risk of False Positives, as actions are taken based on observed user behavior over time. Conclusion In this article, we discussed how to enable malicious user detection and mitigation and how you can block attackers with a very low risk of False Positives. In future articles, we will discuss other scenarios. So please stay tuned. For further information or to get started: F5 Distributed Cloud Platform (Link) F5 Distributed Cloud WAAP Services (Link)Detection of Malicious Users using F5 Distributed Cloud WAAP – Part II
Introduction This is an extension of the already published article Detection of Malicious Users using F5 Distributed Cloud WAAP – Part I an introductory article which highlights the configurations available for detecting and mitigating malicious user activity and includes a demonstration focused on detecting and mitigating malicious clients based on WAF security events. In part II of this series of articles, we will demonstrate a few more scenarios covering insights of malicious user detection and mitigation feature of F5 Distributed Cloud platform. Demonstration (Using Multi Load Balancer ML Configuration) In this demonstration, we will set the threshold limit for failed login attempts in the app settings configuration to mark any subsequent requests as a malicious user event and apply mitigation rules to restrict access, as well as we will detect the clients based on various user identifier types provided by the F5 Distributed cloud console. Step1: Enable malicious user detection using Multi Load Balancer ML config as mentioned in the document. Step2: Add malicious user mitigation rule to the LB In ‘Common Security Controls’, enable ‘Malicious User Mitigation And Challenges’, set 'Malicious User Mitigation Settings' as ‘Custom’, if the rule is already created select and apply the custom mitigation rule, Save & Exit or click on 'Add Item', add a name, set the rules (threat level and associated actions) accordingly, click continue, apply, Save & Exit. (Note: You can also configure the 'Default' malicious user mitigation settings, which has already defined mitigation rules and is a recommended setting). Step3: Go to Home->WAAP->Manage->AI&ML->App Settings, click ‘Add App Setting’. Step4: Enter a name and click on 'Add Item' to go to the ‘AppType’ settings section. Click ‘Add item’. Step5: Click on the ‘Select Item’ drop-down and select the app type configured in the LB while executing Step1. Step6: Click ‘Configure’ ‘Malicious User Detection’, tune the settings as per your need. For the demonstration purpose we are setting the threshold value for Failed Login Activity to 5. Step7: Apply and add the configurations and then click ‘Save and Exit’ to create the app settings object. Note: Identifying users uniquely on the Internet is a critical task because it aids in the creation of a perception by learning from the activities they perform on the application. Step8: Go to Home->WAAP->Manage->Shared Objects->User Identifications, click ‘Add User Identification’ Add a name, click ‘Configure’ on ‘User Identification Rules’, click ‘Add Item’ Set and apply the user identifier type and add the created user identification policy to the LB. Step9: Generate requests more than the configured threshold limit for failed login attempts in your application; it should return response code as 401. Available User Identifier Types: By default, the user identifier type is set to ‘Client IP Address’. As in the previous article, we have already seen IP address as a client identifier. In this demo, we will set other options available, follow the steps mentioned above to generate failed login events and verify that the users are getting detected based on the configured user identification policy. Below are the screenshots for configured user identification rules and UI dashboards displaying the results of associated configurations: Query Parameter Key HTTP Header Name Cookie Name Client Autonomous System TLS Fingerprint Client IP and HTTP Header Name Client IP and TLS Fingerprint Conclusion In this article, we demonstrated how simple it is to configure your LB to respond to multiple unauthorised access attempts by detecting them using various client identification type options and mitigating them automatically at the same time with a very low risk of false positives. For further information or to get started F5 Distributed Cloud Platform (Link) F5 Distributed Cloud WAAP Services (Link)Use F5 Distributed Cloud to control Primary and Secondary DNS
Overview Domain Name Service (DNS); it's how humans and machines discover where to connect. DNS on the Internet is the universal directory of addresses to names. If you need to get support for the product Acme, you go to support.acme.com. Looking for the latest headlines in News, try www.aonn.com or www.npr.org. DNS is the underlying feature that nearly every service on the Internet depends on. Having a robust and reliable DNS provider is critical to keeping your organization online and working, and especially so during a DDoS attack. "Nature is a mutable cloud, which is always and never the same." - Ralph Waldo Emerson We might not wax that philosophically around here, but our heads are in the cloud nonetheless! Join the F5 Distributed Cloud user group today and learn more with your peers and other F5 experts. F5 Distributed Cloud DNS (F5 XC DNS) can function as both Primary or Secondary nameservers, and it natively includes DDoS protection. Using F5 XC DNS, it’s possible to provision and configure primary or secondary DNS securely in minutes. Additionally, the service uses a global anycast network and is built to scale automatically to respond to large query volumes. Dynamic security is included and adds automatic failover, DDoS protection, TSIG authentication support, and when used as a secondary DNS—DNSSEC support. F5 Distributed Cloud allows you to manage all of your sites as a single “logical cloud” providing: - A portable platform that spans multiple sites/clouds - A private backbone connects all sites - Connectivity to sites through its nodes (F5 Distributed Cloud Mesh and F5 Distributed Cloud App Stack) - Node flexibility, allowing it to be virtual machines, live on hardware within data centers, sites, or in cloud instances (e.g. EC2) - Nodes provide vK8s (virtual K8s), network and security services - Services managed through F5 Distributed Cloud’s SaaS base console Scenario 1 – F5 Distributed Cloud DNS: Primary Nameserver Consider the following; you're looking to improve the response time of your app with a geo-distributed solution, including DNS and app distribution. With F5 XC DNS configured as the primary nameserver, you’ll automatically get DNS DDoS protection, and will see an improvement in the response the time to resolve DNS just by using Anycast with F5’s global network’s regional point of presence. To configure F5 XC DNS to be the Primary nameserver for your domain, access the F5 XC Console, go to DNS Management, and then Add Zone. Alternately, if you're migrating from another DNS server or DNS service to F5 XC DNS, you can import this zone directly from your DNS server. Scenario 1.2 below illustrates how to import and migrate your existing DNS zones to F5 XC DNS. Here, you’ll write in the domain name (your DNS zone), and then View Configuration for the Primary DNS. On the next screen, you may change any of the default SOA parameters for the zone, and any type of resource record (RR) or record sets which the DNS server will use to respond to queries. For example, you may want to return more than one A record (IP address) for the frontend to your app when it has multiple points of presence. To do this, enter as many IP addresses of record type A as needed to send traffic to all the points of ingress to your app. Additional Resource Record Sets allows the DNS server to return more than a single type of RR. For example, the following configurations, returns two A (IPv4 address) records and one TXT record to the query of type ANY for “al.demo.internal”. Optionally, if your root DNS zone has been configured for DNSSEC, then enabling it for the zone is just a matter of toggling the default setting in the F5 XC Console. Scenario 1.2 - Import an Existing Primary Zone to Distributed Cloud using Zone Transfer (AXFR) F5 XC DNS can use AXFR DNS zone transfer to import an existing DNS zone. Navigate to DNS Management > DNS Zone Management, then click Import DNS Zone. Enter the zone name and the externally accessible IP of the primary DNS server. ➡️ Note: You'll need to configure your DNS server and any firewall policies to allow zone transfers from F5. A current list of public IP's that F5 uses can be found in the following F5 tech doc. Optionally, configure a transaction signature (TSIG) to secure the DNS zone transfer. When you save and exit, F5 XC DNS executes a secondary nameserver zone AXFR and then transitions itself to be the zone's primary DNS server. To finish the process, you'll need to change the NS records for the zone at your domain name registrar. In the registrar, change the name servers to the following F5 XC DNS servers: ns1.f5clouddns.com ns2.f5clouddns.com Scenario 1.3 - Import Existing (BIND format) Primary Zones directly to Distributed Cloud F5 XC DNS can directly import BIND formatted DNS zone files in the Console, for example, db.2-0-192.in-addr.arpa and db.foo.com. Enterprises often use BIND as their on-prem DNS service, importing these files to Distributed Cloud makes it easier to migrate existing DNS records. To import existing BIND db files, navigate to DNS Management > DNS Zone Management, click Import DNS Zone, then "BIND Import". Now click "Import from File" and upload a .zip with one or more BIND db zone files. The import wizard accepts all primary DNS zones and ignores other zones and files. After uploading a .zip file, the next screen reports any warnings and errors At this poing you can "Save and Exit" to import the new DNS zones or cancel to make any changes. For more complex zone configurations, including support for using $INCLUDE and $ORIGIN directives in BIND files, the following open source tool will convert BIND db files to JSON, which can then be copied directly to the F5 XC Console when configuring records for new and existing Primary DNS zones. BIND to XC-DNS Converter Scenario 2 - F5 Distributed Cloud DNS: Primary with Delegated Subdomains An enhanced capability when using Distributed Cloud (F5 XC) as the primary DNS server for your domains or subdomains, is to have F5 XC dynamically manage the DNS records for its own managed services. Note that prior to July 2023, the delegated DNS feature in F5 XC required the exclusive use of subdomains to use dynamically managed DNS records. As of July 2023, organizations are allowed to have both F5 XC managed and self-managed DNS resource records in the same domain or subdomain. When "Allow HTTP Load Balancer Managed Records" is checked, DNS records automatically added by F5 XC appear in a new RR set group called x-ves-io-managed which is read-only. In the following example, I've created an HTTP Load Balanacer with the domain "www.example.f5-cloud-demo.com" and F5 XC automatically created the A resource record (RR) in the group x-ves-io-managed. Scenario 3 – F5 Distributed Cloud DNS: Secondary Nameserver In this scenario, say you already have a primary DNS server in your on-prem datacenter, but due to security needs, you don’t want it to be directly accessible to the Internet. F5 XC DNS can be configured as a secondary DNS server and support both zone transfer (AXFR, IXFR) and receive (NOTIFY) updates from your primary DNS server. All that's needed to complete this change is to change the nameserver records with your DNS registrar by adding the F5 XC nameservers and removing your the real primary. Having F5 XC DNS as public interface includes complimentary security services, such as DDoS protection and vector scaling. This improves both the uptime of your services as well as reducing latency by allowing all F5's nameservers world-wide to handle domain name resolution. If the primary nameserver is configured for DNSSEC and delivers RRSIG and zone DNSKEY records, F5 XC nameservers will also include these records in the lookups delivered to clients. This ensures a consistent level of security for records management end-to-end. To configure F5 XC DNS to be a secondary DNS server, go to Add Zone, then choose Secondary DNS Configuration. Next, View Configuration for it, and add your primary DNS server IP’s. To enhance the security of zone transfers and updates, F5 XC DNS supports TSIG encrypted transfers from the primary DNS server. To support TSIG, ensure your primary DNS server supports encryption, and enable it by entering the pre-shared key (PSK) name and its value. The PSK itself can be blindfold-encrypted using the F5 XC Console to prevent other admins from being able to see it. If encryption for zone transfers is desired, simply enter the remaining details for your TSIG PSK and click Apply. Once you’ve saved a new secondary DNS configuration, the F5 XC DNS pulls the zone details and begins resolving queries on the F5 XC Global Network with its pool of Anycast-reachable DNS servers. To see the status of individual zones and when they were last transferred by navigating to the DNS Management > DNS Zones overview. As applications mature and your audience broadens, ensuring low-latency for DNS requires additional services. Adding F5 XC DNS to complement an existing BIG-IP GTM or other existing primary nameserver deployment, including with DNSSEC records and TSIG-protected zone transfer support, is straight forward. Conclusion You’ve just seen how to configure F5 XC DNS both as a primary DNS as well as a secondary DNS service. Ensure the reachability of your company with a robust, secure, and optimized DNS service by F5. A service that delivers the lowest resolution latency with its global Anycast network of nameservers, and one that automatically includes DDoS protection, DNSSEC, TSIG support for secondary DNS. Watch the following demo video to see how to configure F5 XC DNS for scenarios #1 and #3 above. Additional Resources On-Demand webinar: Boost resilience and performance with F5 Distributed Cloud DNS Information about using F5 Distributed Cloud DNS Technical documentation DNS Demo Guide and step-by-step walkthrough BIND to XC-DNS Converter (open source tool)JavaScript Supply Chains, Magecart, and F5 XC Client-Side Defense (Demo)
JavaScript Supply Chain Attacks are on the Rise With a firewall, a WAF, bot defense, and a SIEM, you control and monitor web traffic entering the data center. Criminals have adapted their strategies to attack your customers in the browser. New web architectures involving dozens of third-party JavaScript files make this new attack surface even more vulnerable. Increasing Web Page Complexity Enterprises cannot keep track of all the scripts and changes that go on in their website and attackers are exploiting this lack of surveillance to introduce malicious code into the supply chain that their web page relies on. Most use 3rd party libraries (eg. Marketing Scripts) Most 3rd party libraries themeselves depend on another set of 3rd party libraries (eg. jQuery.js) Final page loads on end user's browser can easily contain scripts from 20-30 different organizations Magecart, Formjacking, and E-skimming These attacks occur when a threat actor injects one or many malicious scripts into a legitimate page or code repo to create a software supply chain man-in-the-browser attack (SC-MITB). The attacker can then run keyloggers and any other JavaScript based attacks on the end-users browser stealing any credit card data, username and password combinations etc... which will be sent to the attackers command and control server as pictured below. What is Distributed Cloud Client-Side Defense? F5® Distributed Cloud Client-Side Defense (CSD) provides a multi-phase protection system that protects web applications against Magecart-style and other malicious JavaScript attacks. This multi-phase protection system includes detection, alerting, and mitigation. Detection. A continuously evolving signal set allows CSD to understand when scripts on web pages exhibit signs of exfiltration. CSD detects network requests made by malicious scripts that attempt to exfiltrate PII data. Alerting. CSD generates timely alerts on the behavior of malicious scripts, provided by a continuously improving Analysis Engine. The Analysis Engine contains a machine learning component for accurate and informative analysis and provides details on the behavior of malicious script to help troubleshoot and identify the root cause. Mitigation. CSD detects threats in real-time and provides enforcement with one-click mitigation. CSD leverages the same obfuscation and signal technology as F5® Distributed Cloud Bot Defense, delivering unparalleled efficacy. High Level Distributed Cloud Client-Side Defense Architecture Client-Side Defense Demo: Learn about the risks of JavaScript supply-chain attacks (aka Magecart), the costs of Formjacking and PII Harvesting, and how to detect and mitigate this threat vector. Regain security control of your apps with F5’s Distributed Cloud Client-Side Defense. Related Resources Deploy Bot Defense on any Edge with F5 Distributed Cloud (SaaS Console, Automation) F5 Client-Side Defense Product Page Client-Side Defense DocumentationOperationlizing Online Fraud Detection, Prevention, and Response
Overview A rapidly growing use of digital channels, ample use of AI and ML programs and an endless availability of stolen user credentials to perpetrate attacks and retool as needed have resulted in more sophisticated and common fraud attacks – resulting in increasingly high fraud losses. Fraud organizations continue to struggle with the volume, sophistication, and rapidly evolving threat landscape. As fraudsters fine tune their attack methods, fraud teams are challenged with increased complexity and operational costs. Operationalizing Online Fraud Prevention Demo See in real-time how Distributed Cloud Account Protection stops Online Fraud Attacks and provides a simple and intuitive UI for Fraud Analysts to investigate potential fraud and provide direct feedback to the decision making AI Fraud Engine. Demo Portion Begins at 2:31 Related Resources Deploy Bot Defense on any Edge with F5 Distributed Cloud (SaaS Console, Automation) How Attacks Evolve From Bots to Fraud - Part 2 JavaScript Supply Chains, Magecart, and F5 XC Client-Side Defense (Demo) Bots, Fraud, and the OWASP Automated Threats Project (Overview) F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense (Overview and Demo) F5.com Account ProtectionOWASP Automated Threats - Credential Stuffing (OAT-008)
Introduction: In this OWASP Automated Threat Article we'll be highlighting OAT-008 Credentials Stuffing with some basic threat information as well as a recorded demo to dive into the concepts deeper. In our demo we'll show how Credential Stuffing works with Automation Tools to validate lists of stolen credentials leading to manual Account Takeover and Fraud. We'll wrap it up by highlighting F5 Bot Defense to show how we solve this problem for our customers. Credential Stuffing Description: Lists of authentication credentials stolen from elsewhere are tested against the application’s authentication mechanisms to identify whether users have re-used the same login credentials. The stolen usernames (often email addresses) and password pairs could have been sourced directly from another application by the attacker, purchased in a criminal marketplace, or obtained from publicly available breach data dumps. Unlike OAT-007 Credential Cracking, Credential Stuffing does not involve any bruteforcing or guessing of values; instead credentials used in other applications are being tested for validity Likelihood & Severity Credential stuffing is one of the most common techniques used to take-over user accounts. Credential stuffing is dangerous to both consumers and enterprises because of the ripple effects of these breaches. Anatomy of Attack The attacker acquires usernames and passwords from a website breach, phishing attack, password dump site. The attacker uses automated tools to test the stolen credentials against many websites (for instance, social media sites, online marketplaces, or web apps). If the login is successful, the attacker knows they have a set of valid credentials. Now the attacker knows they have access to an account. Potential next steps include: Draining stolen accounts of stored value or making purchases. Accessing sensitive information such as credit card numbers, private messages, pictures, or documents. Using the account to send phishing messages or spam. Selling known-valid credentials to one or more of the compromised sites for other attackers to use. OWASP Automated Threat (OAT) Identity Number OAT-008 Threat Event Name Credential Stuffing Summary Defining Characteristics Mass log in attempts used to verify the validity of stolen username/password pairs. OAT-008 Attack Demographics: Sectors Targeted Parties Affected Data Commonly Misused Other Names and Examples Possible Symptoms Entertainment Many Users Authentication Credentials Account Checker Attack Sequential login attempts with different credentials from the same HTTP client (based on IP, User Agent, device, fingerprint, patterns in HTTP headers, etc.) Financial Application Owner Account Checking High number of failed login attempts Government Account Takeover Increased customer complaints of account hijacking through help center or social media outlets Retail Login Stuffing Social Networking Password List Attack Password re-use Use of Stolen Credentials Credential Stuffing Demo: In this demo we will be showing how attackers leverage automation tools with increasing sophistication to execute credential stuffing against the sign in page of a web application. We'll then have a look at the same attack with F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense protecting the application. In Conclusion: A common truism in the security industry says that there are two types of companies—those that have been breached, and those that just don’t know it yet. As of 2022, we should be updating that to something like “There are two types of companies—those that acknowledge the threat of credential stuffing and those that will be its victims.” Credential stuffing will be a threat so long as we require users to log in to accounts online. The most comprehensive way to prevent credential stuffing is to use an anti-automation platform. OWASP Links OWASP Automated Threats to Web Applications Home Page OWASP Automated Threats Identification Chart OWASP Automated Threats to Web Applications Handbook F5 Related Content Deploy Bot Defense on any Edge with F5 Distributed Cloud (SaaS Console, Automation) F5 Bot Defense Solutions F5 Labs "I Was a Human CATPCHA Solver" The OWASP Automated Threats Project OWASP Automated Threats - CAPTCHA Defeat (OAT-009) How Attacks Evolve From Bots to Fraud Part: 1 How Attacks Evolve From Bots to Fraud Part: 2 F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense F5 Labs 2021 Credential Stuffing Report
OWASP Automated Threats - OAT-005 Scalping
Introduction: In this OWASP Automated Threat Article we'll be highlighting OAT-005 Scalping with some basic threat information as well as a recorded demo to dive into the concepts deeper. In our demo we'll show how Automation is used to monitor and wait for goods or services to become available and then take rapid action to beat normal users to obtain them. We'll wrap it up by highlighting F5 XC Bot Defense to show how we solve this problem for our customers. Scalping Description: Acquisition of goods or services using the application in a manner that a normal user would be unable to undertake manually. Although Scalping may include monitoring awaiting availability of the goods or services, and then rapid action to beat normal users to obtain these. Scalping includes the additional concept of limited availability of sought-after goods or services, and is most well known in the ticketing business where the tickets acquired are then resold later at a profit by the scalpers. OWASP Automated Threat (OAT) Identity Number OAT-005 Threat Event Name Scalping Summary Defining Characteristics Obtain limited-availability and/or preferred goods/services by unfair methods. OAT-005 Attack Demographics: Sectors Targeted Parties Affected Data Commonly Misused Other Names and Examples Possible Symptoms Entertainment Many Users NA Bulk purchase High peaks of traffic for certain limited-availability goods or services Financial Application Owner Purchase automation Increased circulation of limited goods reselling on secondary market Retail Purchase bot Queue jumping Ticket Scalping Scalping Demo: In this demo we will be showing a simple example of how automation is used to monitor and wait for goods or services to become available and then take rapid action to beat normal users to obtain them. We'll then have a look at the same attack with F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense protecting the application. In Conclusion: Scalping Bots are a real problem for organization and customers as they are made up of a vast ecosystem to acquire large amounts of inventory at scale to be sold for a profit. F5 has the solutions to provide superior efficacy to interrupt and stop this unwanted automation. OWASP Links OWASP Automated Threats to Web Applications Home Page OWASP Automated Threats Identification Chart OWASP Automated Threats to Web Applications Handbook F5 Related Content Deploy Bot Defense on any Edge with F5 Distributed Cloud (SaaS Console, Automation) F5 Bot Defense Solutions The OWASP Automated Threats Project OWASP Automated Threats - CAPTCHA Defeat (OAT-009) OWASP Automated Threats - Credential Stuffing (OAT-008) OWASP Automated Threats - OAT-001 Carding Operationlizing Online Fraud Detection, Prevention, and Response JavaScript Supply Chains, Magecart, and F5 XC Client-Side Defense (Demo) How Attacks Evolve From Bots to Fraud Part: 1 How Attacks Evolve From Bots to Fraud Part: 2 F5 Distributed Cloud Bot DefenseEnabling F5 Distributed Cloud Client-Side Defense in BIG-IP 17.1
Introduction In the freshest BIG-IP release, version 17.1, we continue to expand, enrich, and streamline the realm of application security, delivery, and automation that BIG-IP platforms provide for applications. In this article we'll be zooming in on the new Distributed Cloud Client-Side Defense connectivity which enables a self-managed service that seamlessly integrates with F5 BIG-IP to protect against client-side attacks such as Magecart, digital skimming, formjacking, (PII) harvesting, and other types of browser-based supply chain attacks. New BIG-IP Distributed Cloud Services Module Immersed within this cutting-edge release we're empowering our customers with an ingenious Distributed Cloud Services Integration Module. This powerful module grants customers the ability to harness their existing BIG-IP deployments and effortlessly apply cloud-based security services to their application transactions, all from within the intuitive BIG-IP console. These remarkable security services act as a catalyst, empowering application owners and security personnel to harness the sheer might of industry-leading Bot and Fraud cloud connectors. This union allows for a seamless integration with the F5 Distributed Cloud Services, ensuring that simplicity and security are bestowed upon every aspect of this integration. XC Client-Side Defense Solution Overview In BIG-IP 17.1 Distributed Cloud Client-Side Defense connectivity enables a self-managed service that seamlessly integrates with F5 BIG-IP to protect against client-side attacks such as Magecart, digital skimming, formjacking, (PII) harvesting, and other types of browser-based supply chain attacks. By providing real-time monitoring of a web application’s JavaScript libraries for malicious activities, Distributed Cloud Client-Side Defense protects consumer data from being accessed by cybercriminals and assists organizations in meeting the new PCI DSS 4.0 requirements CSD Onboarding Demo Conclusion In conclusion, this revolutionary BIG-IP 17.1 release includes Distributed Cloud Client-Side Defense and acts as a vigilant guardian, actively monitoring the JavaScript libraries of web applications in real-time. This unwavering surveillance serves a paramount purpose—safeguarding consumer data from the clutches of malicious cybercriminals. Furthermore, this formidable defense mechanism offers invaluable assistance to organizations by aiding them in meeting the stringent demands of the new PCI DSS 4.0 requirements. With its watchful eye and unwavering commitment to security, Distributed Cloud Client-Side Defense emerges as an indispensable asset in the realm of safeguarding sensitive information. Additional Resources Deploy Bot Defense on any Edge with F5 Distributed Cloud (SaaS Console, Automation) F5 Client-Side Defense Client-Side Defense Documentation Youtube Demo - Enabling F5 Distributed Cloud Client-Side Defense in BIG-IP 17.1 Automating Deployment of F5 Distributed Cloud Client-Side DefenseOWASP Automated Threats - CAPTCHA Defeat (OAT-009)
Introduction: In this OWASP Automated Threat Article we'll be highlighting OAT-009 CAPTCHA Defeat with some basic threat information as well as a recorded demo to dive into the concepts deeper. In our demo we'll show how CAPTCHA Defeat works with Automation Tools to allow attackers to accomplish their objectives despite the presence of CAPTCHA's intended purpose of preventing unwanted automation. We'll wrap it up by highlighting F5 Bot Defense to show how we solve this problem for our customers. CAPTCHA Defeat Description: Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart (CAPTCHA) challenges are used to distinguish normal users from bots. Automation is used in an attempt to analyse and determine the answer to visual and/or aural CAPTCHA tests and related puzzles. Apart from conventional visual and aural CAPTCHA, puzzle solving mini games or arithmetical exercises are sometimes used. Some of these may include context-specific challenges. The process that determines the answer may utilise tools to perform optical character recognition, or matching against a prepared database of pre-generated images, or using other machine reading, or human farms. OWASP Automated Threat (OAT) Identity Number OAT-009 Threat Event Name CAPTCHA Defeat Summary Defining Characteristics Solve anti-automation tests. OAT-009 Attack Demographics: Sectors Targeted Parties Affected Data Commonly Misused Other Names and Examples Possible Symptoms Education Application Owners Authentication Credentials Breaking CAPTCHA High CAPTCHA solving success rate on fraudulent accounts Entertainment CAPTCHA breaker Suspiciously fast or fixed CAPTCHA solving times Financial CAPTCHA breaking Government CAPTCHA bypass Retail CAPTCHA decoding Social Networking CAPTCHA solver CAPTCHA solving Puzzle solving CAPTCHA Defeat Demo: In this demo we will be showing how it’s possible to leverage real human click farms via CAPTCHA solving services like 2CAPTCHA to bypass reCAPTCHA. We'll then have a look at the same attack with F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense protecting the application. In Conclusion: CAPTCHAs are only a speed bump for motivated attackers while introducing considerable friction for legitimate customers. Today, we’re at a point where bots solve CAPTCHAs more quickly and easily than most humans. Check out our additional resource links below to learn more. OWASP Links OWASP Automated Threats to Web Applications Home Page OWASP Automated Threats Identification Chart OWASP Automated Threats to Web Applications Handbook F5 Related Content Deploy Bot Defense on any Edge with F5 Distributed Cloud (SaaS Console, Automation) F5 Bot Defense Solutions F5 Labs "I Was a Human CATPCHA Solver" The OWASP Automated Threats Project How Attacks Evolve From Bots to Fraud Part: 1 How Attacks Evolve From Bots to Fraud Part: 2 F5 Distributed Cloud Bot Defense F5 Labs 2021 Credential Stuffing Report
