Apache to F5 Configuration
Hi everyone, We are having trouble with our F5 Configuration.Here is the scenario: We are using Mobile application (from playstore) to access the server. It uses standard VS with port 443 and performing SSL offloading. Configuration is based from the Apache Server which is currently on production and no error. Single server is used to access using Web and Mobile Application, only uses different ports.Here is the config: ProxyPass /fo connectiontimeout=60 timeout=600 ProxyPassReverse / timeout=600 ProxyPass /mob connectiontimeout=60 timeout=600 ProxyPassReverse /mob timeout=600 Looking at the firewall, no other port being used by the client when accessing using application. we captured some pcap, based on it, F5 can receive the traffic and can exchange SSL. However, we cannot see that F5 is sending the traffic to the server.It seems that there is configuration error with the virtual server. We tried changing the type to Performance L4 but SSL-offloading is removed. we also changed the protocol to All protocol, but still, SSL-offloading is removed. Is there a way to have All protocol type of VS but with SSL-offloading? If this can be done via irule. If not, does anyone experienced the same problem (using mobile application passing thru F5). Thank you all for the response.
Port Redirection Failure
I'm using a Non-Prod F5 running 12.1.2 Build 1.292.271. We have a cluster of nodes that serve up various Apps on different ports. /App1 - 80 /App2 - 81 /App3 - 82 I have configured a pool with members that have all service ports enabled. Also a single VS with a VIP and a service port of 0. Here is my iRule: when HTTP_REQUEST { switch -glob [HTTP::uri] { "/App1*" { set port 80 } "/App2*" { set port 81 } "/App3* { set port 82 } } } when LB_SELECTED { pool [LB::server pool] member [LB::server addr] $port } When running statistics on the iRule I get failures in the "LB_SELECTED" part however from my prospective this should be the correct syntax to change the service port on a pool. I would like some feedback on this configuration and if someone can comment on this configuration. Thanks.