NGINX
16 TopicsHow to rewrite a path to a backend service dropping the prefix and passing the remaining path?
Hello, I am not sure whether my posting is appropriate in this area, so please delete it if there is a violation of posting rules... This must be a common task, but I cannot figure out how to do the following fanout rewrite in our nginx ingress: http://abcccc.com/httpbin/anything-> /anything (the httpbin backend service) When I create the following ingress with a path of '/' and send the query, I receive a proper response. curl -I -k http://abczzz.com/anything apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1 kind: Ingress metadata: name: mikie-ingress namespace: mikie spec: ingressClassName: nginx rules: - host: abczzz.com http: paths: - path: / pathType: Prefix backend: service: name: httpbin-service port: number: 8999 What I really need is to be able to redirect to different services off of this single host, so I changed the ingress to the following, but the query always fails with a 404. Basically, I want the /httpbin to disappear and pass the path onto the backend service, httpbin. curl -I -k http://abczzz.com/httpbin/anything apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1 kind: Ingress metadata: name: mikie-ingress namespace: mikie annotations: nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/rewrite-target: /$2 spec: ingressClassName: nginx rules: - host: abczzz.com http: paths: - path: /httpbin(/|$)(.*) pathType: Prefix backend: service: name: httpbin-service port: number: 8999 Thank you for your time and interest, Mike19KViews0likes15Commentsdoes nginx (1.20 or newer) re-resolve DNS for proxy_pass?
Consider this nginx config snippet: location ^~ /_example/ { proxy_pass https://example.com/_example/; proxy_set_header Host my-site; } Assuming "example.com" DNS TTL is set to 60 seconds - will nginx re-resolve DNS after 60 seconds? Or does it only resolve the name on startup? I'm finding different info around the internet: - it will re-resolve only in the commercial nginx plus - it will re-resolve only in newer nginx releases; in older ones, one need to make some workarounds - it will only resolve once on startup and never again12KViews0likes5CommentsDoes NGINX Controller allow the creation of upstream server groups/farms configuraton components?
Hello, After looking at many videos and articles I didn't see an option to define the upstream server groups/farms that an Application Component should use and I am starting to think that the Nginx Controller GUI and API can't be used for managing the sever farm definitions. There is a new option called snippets or using the Nginx Instance Manager but this is strange to me that this seems to have not been added in the Nginx Controller GUI/API as this way the configuration will be validated or I am wrong about this? https://docs.nginx.com/nginx-controller/app-delivery/manage-apps/ https://docs.nginx.com/nginx-controller/app-delivery/about-snippets/Solved2.3KViews0likes1CommentConfig NGINX to F5
Hi everyone, I have VS. NGINX require script to implement at F5 profile but i dont know where I must config at F5 configuration. Here the NGINX requirement : client_max_body_size 5000M; client_body_buffer_size 5000M; client_body_timeout 4024; client_header_timeout 3024; Where I must config that NGINX requirement to the VS in F5 ??? Using profile or irules ?? How to set up ? ThanksSolved1.8KViews1like4CommentsKnowledge sharing: Containers, Kubernetes, Openshift, F5 Container Connector, NGINX Ingress
For anyone interested about the free traning for "F5 Container Connector for Kubernetes" or "F5 OpenShift Container Integration" at "LearnF5". For NGINX being installed in Kubernetes there is enough info but for F5 Contaner Connector/Container Ingress Services there is not so much: https://docs.nginx.com/nginx-ingress-controller/f5-ingresslink/ https://www.nginx.com/products/nginx-ingress-controller/ https://community.f5.com/t5/technical-articles/better-together-f5-container-ingress-services-and-nginx-plus/ta-p/280471 F5 Devcentral also has youtube channel with usefull info: https://www.youtube.com/c/devcentral If you don't have good knowledge about containers and kubernetes then first check the links below. For Docker containers in youtube you will find a lot of good training for example: you need to learn Kubernetes RIGHT NOW!! - YouTube Docker Tutorial for Beginners [FULL COURSE in 3 Hours] - YouTube Docker overview | Docker Documentation The same is true for Kubernetes and they have a free test lab on their site: Learn Kubernetes Basics | Kubernetes you need to learn Docker RIGHT NOW!! // Docker Containers 101 - YouTube Red Hat has some free training and IBM provides some free labs for Containers, Kubernetes, Openshift etc.: Training and Certification (redhat.com) IBM CloudLabs: Free, Interactive Kubernetes Tutorials | IBM Red Hat OpenShift Tutorials | IBM957Views5likes2CommentsConverting NGINX script to F5 iRules
Hii Everyone, Can i ask about converting NGINX script to iRules F5? I have a NGINX script : [root@webdplk conf.d]# cat simponi.conf server { listen 80; listen 443; server_name dplk.bni.co.id; location / { proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Server $host; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto https; proxy_pass http://192.168.3.187; } location /mobile { rewrite /mobile(.*) /$1 break; proxy_pass http://192.168.3.186:7005/; } } server { listen 7005; server_name dplk.bni.co.id; location / { rewrite /mobile(.*) /$1 break; proxy_pass http://192.168.3.186:7005/; } } [root@webdplk conf.d]# How if that script if convert to F5 IRules?? Thankyouu934Views0likes1CommentNGINX Migration, Rewrite Profile: Is there another way?
We are migrating, as part of a project, a big NGINX implementation to an F5. Basically, it would assume the role of a reverse proxy. The two biggest things the NGINX does are: Translating from external hosts (www.example.com) to internal hosts (www.example.local) Load balancing between different back-end servers, depending on the URI. For the first point: There are a BUNCH of translations. We're using a rewrite profile. Sometimes, www.example.com/ translates to www.example.local/, and www.example.com/app1/ translates to www.example2.com/app1. And, on a single rewrite profile, there are, I think, more than 50 rules. Is there a better way of doing this? Should we really modify back-end servers to accept both hosts, external and internal? And, how do we deal with URI's with no trailing slash? If they have none, it won't match the rewrite rule. Should we add 301 respond to each and every URI? The second: Should we use policies or iRules? I've got to confess, we have already big iRules, separated with procs and the like. So, migrating that to policies would be a pain in the ass. EDIT: One more question: We have different client side URL, that need to be rewritten to the same server. www.example.com/app1 and www.example.com/app2 to www.example.local/. However, for some reason, rewrite profile does not allow for this. How can we achieve it?577Views0likes1CommentProblems with CSS and JS with Docker
Hi! I'm having some problems deploying a dynamic website via Docker with Nginx. It seems that everything in my configuration is okay because it deploys correctly but my website does not apply my CSS or JS files. Also, i have to say that the images i have on directories below do apply correctly. Can anyone help me please? Thank you.504Views0likes2CommentsNginx is only redirecting to port 8080
I have a .net 8 solution multiple APIs and I'm using docker and Nginx to host the application. please find below the full details: Dockerfile FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:8.0 AS base WORKDIR /app EXPOSE 8080 FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:8.0 AS build ARG BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Release ... FROM build AS publish ARG BUILD_CONFIGURATION=Release RUN dotnet publish "xxx.Api/xxx.Api.csproj" -c Release -o /app/publish /p:UseAppHost=false FROM base AS final WORKDIR /app COPY --from=publish /app/publish . ENTRYPOINT ["dotnet", "xxx.Api.dll"] launchsettings.json "Docker": { "commandName": "Docker", "launchBrowser": true, "launchUrl": "{Scheme}://{ServiceHost}:{ServicePort}/swagger", "publishAllPorts": true, "useSSL": true, "sslPort": 4430, "httpPort": 8080 } nginx.conf worker_processes auto; events { worker_connections 1024; } http{ server { listen 80; server_name domain; port_in_redirect off; location /api1 { rewrite /api1(.*) $1 break; proxy_pass http://api1:8080; proxy_http_version 1.1; proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade; proxy_set_header Connection 'upgrade'; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_cache_bypass $http_upgrade; } location /api2 { rewrite /api2(.*) $1 break; proxy_pass http://api2:8081; proxy_http_version 1.1; proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade; proxy_set_header Connection 'upgrade'; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_cache_bypass $http_upgrade; } } docker-compose version: '3.4' services: nginx: image: nginx ports: - 80:80 volumes: - ./nginx.conf:/etc/nginx/nginx.conf:ro depends_on: - api1 - api2 api1: image: ${DOCKER_REGISTRY-}api1:latest container_name: api1 build: context: . dockerfile: api1.Api/Dockerfile ports: - "8080:8080" api2: image: ${DOCKER_REGISTRY-}api2:latest container_name: api2 build: context: . dockerfile: api2.API/Dockerfile ports: - "8081:8081" API1 that uses port 8080 loads normally but API2 that uses 8081 get error 502 gateway error. If I switch the port on those same projects than API2 loads normally and API1 stops loading. I've been trying all kinds of stuff over last 2 days and nothing seems to work. Those same projects with the same configuration were working perfectly when I was using .net 6 with the same nginx version, but when I upgraded the project to .net 8 it broke. I need your help and suggestions. Anything will be helpfull.499Views0likes2Comments